2015
DOI: 10.1101/025957
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme Mitogenomic Variation Without Cryptic Speciation in Chaetognaths

Abstract: The extent of within-species genetic variation across the diversity of animal life is a fundamental but largely unexplored problem in ecology and evolution. The neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that genetic variation scales positively with population size. However, the genetic diversity of mitochondrial DNA, a prominent marker used in DNA barcoding studies, shows very little variation across animal species. Here, we report an unprecedented case of extreme mitochondrial variation within natural po… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was confirmed by the ABGD analysis. Extreme levels of genetic variation have been reported within natural populations in, for example, planktonic chaetognaths (arrow worms)40 and mesopelagic shrimp41. Many instances of high mitochondrial diversity have directly or indirectly been interpreted as evidence of cryptic speciation, but some of these cases may need to be subjected to re-evaluation when investigated using nuclear loci4042.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was confirmed by the ABGD analysis. Extreme levels of genetic variation have been reported within natural populations in, for example, planktonic chaetognaths (arrow worms)40 and mesopelagic shrimp41. Many instances of high mitochondrial diversity have directly or indirectly been interpreted as evidence of cryptic speciation, but some of these cases may need to be subjected to re-evaluation when investigated using nuclear loci4042.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%