2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1905298116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme heterogeneity in sex chromosome differentiation and dosage compensation in livebearers

Abstract: Once recombination is halted between the X and Y chromosomes, sex chromosomes begin to differentiate and transition to heteromorphism. While there is a remarkable variation across clades in the degree of sex chromosome divergence, far less is known about the variation in sex chromosome differentiation within clades. Here, we combined whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing data to characterize the structure and conservation of sex chromosome systems across Poeciliidae, the livebearing clade that includes gup… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
180
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
17
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus possible for a sex chromosome pair to have distinct gene content and significant allelic differences even though they appear to be morphologically similar (Conte, Gammerdinger, Bartie, Penman, & Kocher, 2017;Fontaine et al, 2017;Perry et al, 2018;Toups, Rodrigues, Perrin, & Kirkpatrick, 2019;Zhou et al, 2014), including the Aristelliger sex chromosomes presented here. Indeed, there are (Darolti et al, 2019;Kamiya et al, 2012;Kottler et al, 2020;Lahn & Page, 1999;Zhou et al, 2014). Thus, the overly simplistic distinction between homomorphic and heteromorphic sex chromosomes that emerged when cytogenetics was the prevailing technology may fail to describe the continuum of differences between gametologs that can be distinguished using DNA sequence data (Furman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus possible for a sex chromosome pair to have distinct gene content and significant allelic differences even though they appear to be morphologically similar (Conte, Gammerdinger, Bartie, Penman, & Kocher, 2017;Fontaine et al, 2017;Perry et al, 2018;Toups, Rodrigues, Perrin, & Kirkpatrick, 2019;Zhou et al, 2014), including the Aristelliger sex chromosomes presented here. Indeed, there are (Darolti et al, 2019;Kamiya et al, 2012;Kottler et al, 2020;Lahn & Page, 1999;Zhou et al, 2014). Thus, the overly simplistic distinction between homomorphic and heteromorphic sex chromosomes that emerged when cytogenetics was the prevailing technology may fail to describe the continuum of differences between gametologs that can be distinguished using DNA sequence data (Furman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is often challenging and highly dependent on conservation of synteny across clades. However, a number of different methods are available for this purpose, including the Reference-Assisted Chromosome Assembly (RACA) algorithm (Kim et al, 2013) as used in Darolti et al (2019), or a custom approach developed by Jeffries et al (2018), involving the generation of linkage maps from RAD-seq data to anchor scaffolds to an outgroup reference genome. The importance of these algorithms, as well as the importance of generating chromosomal-level genome assemblies in multiple species, will be a priority in order to estimate the diversity of sex chromosomes in many undersampled clades.…”
Section: Box 1 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying species or populations where there is variation in the extent of recombination suppression between sex chromosomes, as in Poeciliids (Bergero et al, 2019;Darolti et al, 2019;, promises to be a fruitful avenue. A powerful approach would be targeting young sex chromosomes within a sex-specific evolution framework to test whether sexually antagonistic mutations accumulate prior to recombination suppression (Ponnikas, Sigeman, Abbott, & Hansson, 2018).…”
Section: Sexually Antagonistic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of suppressed recombination and accumulation of deleterious mutations, the sex chromosomes differ in their structure, function and gene density. The X chromosome becomes hemizygous and X hemizygosity in males leads to special regulatory mechanisms to equalize the transcription ratio between the X chromosomes and autosomes (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 2005;Muyle et al, 2017;Darolti et al, 2019). As a result of accumulation of deleterious mutations, the Y chromosome is degenerated and the sex chromosomes may differ even within closely related species as demonstrated in human and chimpanzee (Hughes et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%