1963
DOI: 10.5802/aif.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme harmonic functions and boundary value problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
12

Year Published

1965
1965
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition 1.2 (cf. [13,26]). (i) For any nonnegative superharmonic function u on X and E cz X, the reduced function ofuonE is defined on X by REu(x, t) = inf{w(;ï, t): wis nonnegative, superharmonic on Xand w > uon £}.…”
Section: 2])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition 1.2 (cf. [13,26]). (i) For any nonnegative superharmonic function u on X and E cz X, the reduced function ofuonE is defined on X by REu(x, t) = inf{w(;ï, t): wis nonnegative, superharmonic on Xand w > uon £}.…”
Section: 2])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Gowrisankaran [8] for a discussion of the possibilities. Cartan pointed out in .1940 that the topology on R w^hich is the smallest topology (fewest open sets) making superharmonic functions continuous is precisely the fine topology on R, defined above in terms of thinness.…”
Section: Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a generalisation of Doob's theorem to functions of several variables can be proved, but the limits are those following the "fine" filters [5] canonical to the structure of the multiply harmonic functions. More precisely, we have to consider "fine" filters corresponding to the minimal positive multiply harmonic functions; and these filters are finer than the product of the fine filters corresponding to the minimal positive harmonic functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%