2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-017-0324-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremality and dynamically defined measures, part I: Diophantine properties of quasi-decaying measures

Abstract: We present a new method of proving the Diophantine extremality of various dynamically defined measures, vastly expanding the class of measures known to be extremal. This generalizes and improves the celebrated theorem of Kleinbock and Margulis ('98) resolving Sprindžuk's conjecture, as well as its extension by Kleinbock, Lindenstrauss, and Weiss ('04), hereafter abbreviated KLW. As applications we prove the extremality of all hyperbolic measures of smooth dynamical systems with sufficiently large Hausdorff dim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These facts are proven in [, Theorem 1.9; , Theorem 2.3], respectively. Recently, the concept of friendly measures has been generalised even further to the notion of quasi‐decaying measures, see .…”
Section: The General Setup and Main Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These facts are proven in [, Theorem 1.9; , Theorem 2.3], respectively. Recently, the concept of friendly measures has been generalised even further to the notion of quasi‐decaying measures, see .…”
Section: The General Setup and Main Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural candidate is what we call the Schubert closure of M, which is the intersection of the pencils containing M. It is an algebraic variety, which is in general bigger than the Zariski closure of M. In the classical setting of submanifolds of M m,n (R) this is the same space as the space H(M) considered by Beresnevich, Kleinbock and Margulis in [BKM15, 7.2]. The Plücker closure considered here and in [DFSU15] is in general smaller than the Schubert closure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Theorem 1.4 has been established independently in the recent work of Das, Fishman, Simmons and Urbanski, see [DFSU15,Theorem 1.9]. In this work the authors introduce a very general class of measures, which is invariant under measure automorphisms and encompasses many fractal measures of dynamical origin, for which Theorem 1.4 is shown to hold, see the discussion after [DFSU15, Definition 1.2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more than a decade now, as part of the burgeoning study of Diophantine properties of fractal sets and measures [5,9,10,13,19], there has been a growing interest in computing the Hausdorff dimension of the intersection of BA d with various fractal sets. Since BA d has full dimension, one expects its intersection with any fractal set J ⊆ R d to have the same dimension as J , and this can be proven for certain broad classes of fractal sets J , see e.g.…”
Section: T Das Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now let τ ∈ E * = ∞ n=0 E n be a word of fixed length (independent of N ) such that 5) and consider the diagonal IFS = N = (ψ ω ) ω∈T 0 , where for each ω ∈ T 0 we write…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%