2000
DOI: 10.1006/aima.1998.1889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremal Point Sets and Gorenstein Ideals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any two k-configurations in P 2 of the same type have the same minimal free resolution, and so the same Hilbert function ( [2,3]). We recall that if X is a linear star-configuration in P 2 of type r with 3 ≤ r, then X is a k-configuration in P 2 of type T = (1, 2, .…”
Section: The Union Of Two K-configurations In Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any two k-configurations in P 2 of the same type have the same minimal free resolution, and so the same Hilbert function ( [2,3]). We recall that if X is a linear star-configuration in P 2 of type r with 3 ≤ r, then X is a k-configuration in P 2 of type T = (1, 2, .…”
Section: The Union Of Two K-configurations In Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If I := I X is the ideal of a subscheme X in P n , then we denote the Hilbert function of X by H X (t) := H(R/I X , t) (see [2,3]). Let X be a set of s points in P 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this appears to be a very challenging problem, it has attracted a great deal of attention. There are: complete results for reduced subschemes of P 2 (this follows from results of Campanella [10]); a sharp upper bound for any Hilbert function (in terms of the graded Betti numbers) by Bigatti [3], Hulett [41] and Pardue [53]; complete results in low codimension and under the assumption that the coordinate ring of the reduced scheme is (in some way) special-e.g., for codimension two and codimension 3 Gorenstein see, e.g., Diesel [21] and Geramita and Migliore [32], while for Gorenstein rings with the Weak Lefschetz Property see, e.g., Geramita, Harima and Shin [29], Migliore and Nagel [49], where there are sharp upper bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular if c = 2, it induces a complex (8) 0 Proposition 9), and its open subscheme of Gorenstein quotients coincides, at least topologically and infinitesimally, with PGor(H) (the corresponding scheme of forms with "catalecticant structure"; see Theorem 11 below and the material before it). B is called unobstructed as a graded R-algebra iff GradAlg H B (R) is smooth at (R → B).…”
Section: Moreover a Is Unobstructed As A Graded R-algebra If And Onlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is standard to use sums of geometrically linked ideals to construct Gorenstein algebras (e.g. [8], [9], [10], [15]). By the corresponding more general construction of using geometric Gorenstein linkage, we also get Gorenstein algebras (e.g.…”
Section: Moreover a Is Unobstructed As A Graded R-algebra If And Onlmentioning
confidence: 99%