1999
DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraversion: The Unloved Variable in Applied Linguistic Research

Abstract: The relatively small number of linguistic studies in which extraversion is focussed on as an independent variable suggests that applied linguists believe it unrelated to speech production or language learning. We argue that this suspicion is based on a misunderstanding originating in the 1970s. Reappraisal of the literature suggests that extraversion may not be a predictor of success in second language learning but does affect both L1 and L2 speech production. An analysis of the psychological literature on ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
147
1
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
147
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Extraverted stories averaged 282 words in length, while introverted stories averaged 170 words in length, p < .001, an average difference of over 100 words. Differences in volume of spoken words produced have been found in prior extraversion research (Dewaele & Furnham, 1999). However, introverted and extraverted dyads did not differ with regard to the number of stories produced; overall, an average of three or four stories were told per dyad (range = 1-8).…”
Section: Gender Differencesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Extraverted stories averaged 282 words in length, while introverted stories averaged 170 words in length, p < .001, an average difference of over 100 words. Differences in volume of spoken words produced have been found in prior extraversion research (Dewaele & Furnham, 1999). However, introverted and extraverted dyads did not differ with regard to the number of stories produced; overall, an average of three or four stories were told per dyad (range = 1-8).…”
Section: Gender Differencesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A review by Furnham (1990) describes linguistic features linked to extraversion and other traits, and Dewaele and Furnham (1999) review studies focusing on the link between extraversion and both language learning and speech production.…”
Section: Markers Of Extraversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extravert students learning French as a second language produce more back-channels, and have a more implicit style and a lower lexical richness in formal situations. It seems that the more complex the task and the higher the level of anxiety, the easier it is to differentiate between introverts and extraverts (Dewaele & Furnham, 1999). Heylighen and Dewaele (2002) also note that extraversion is significantly correlated with contextuality, as opposed to formality.…”
Section: Markers Of Extraversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sax (1999) et Thomas (2000) ont également trouvé que les apprenants de français en contexte scolaire omettaient le ne mais qu'ils le faisaient moins souvent que les locuteurs L1. Noyau (1984), de Dewaele (1992, 1999a, b, 2001c, à paraître a, b), Dewaele et Furnham (1999, 2000a, b), de Regan (1995 c) Ceux qui ont une anxiété langagière plus limitée (notamment les extravertis) oseront omettre le ne davantage. La prohibition de la part des enseignants belges d'utiliser des mots d'argot et des registres trop familiers pourrait décourager les locuteurs à utiliser cette caractéristique syntaxique jugée trop populaire.…”
unclassified