2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraversion and cardiovascular responses to recurrent social stress: Effect of stress intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this reasoning, previous studies show extraversion and personality measures of positive emotionality associated with lower cardiovascular and cortisol reactivity (Childs et al, 2014; Evans et al., 2016; Jonassaint et al., 2009; Pearson & Freeman, 1991) and greater habituation to repeated stressors (Lü et al., 2018). In contrast, findings for neuroticism and negative emotionality are somewhat mixed with some studies reporting greater cardiovascular reactivity (Evans et al., 2016; Jonassaint et al., 2009; Kennedy & Hughes, 2004; Schwebel & Suls, 1999), while others report lower reactivity (Bibbey et al., 2013; Childs et al, 2014; Habra et al., 2003; Hughes et al., 2011) or null associations (Puig‐Perez et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with this reasoning, previous studies show extraversion and personality measures of positive emotionality associated with lower cardiovascular and cortisol reactivity (Childs et al, 2014; Evans et al., 2016; Jonassaint et al., 2009; Pearson & Freeman, 1991) and greater habituation to repeated stressors (Lü et al., 2018). In contrast, findings for neuroticism and negative emotionality are somewhat mixed with some studies reporting greater cardiovascular reactivity (Evans et al., 2016; Jonassaint et al., 2009; Kennedy & Hughes, 2004; Schwebel & Suls, 1999), while others report lower reactivity (Bibbey et al., 2013; Childs et al, 2014; Habra et al., 2003; Hughes et al., 2011) or null associations (Puig‐Perez et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In contrast, findings for neuroticism and negative emotionality are somewhat mixed with some studies reporting greater cardiovascular reactivity (Evans et al., 2016; Jonassaint et al., 2009; Kennedy & Hughes, 2004; Schwebel & Suls, 1999), while others report lower reactivity (Bibbey et al., 2013; Childs et al, 2014; Habra et al., 2003; Hughes et al., 2011) or null associations (Puig‐Perez et al., 2016). Similar to the limitations of the literature on negative emotionality and cardiovascular outcomes, studies exploring the relationship of positive or negative emotionality with cardiovascular reactivity also fail to control for the other dimension of emotionality (e.g., Bibbey et al., 2013; Childs et al, 2014; Hughes et al., 2011; Jonassaint et al., 2009; Lü et al., 2018; Puig‐Perez et al., 2016). It is unclear, again, as to whether positive or negative emotionality most strongly associates with cardiovascular reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also likely that complexity and interactions of the traits themselves -not just methodological differences -may lead to differences in findings. For example, research indicates that those who have higher levels of extraversion are likely to exhibit cardiovascular responses which are more flexible, more attentive to changing environments, and therefore more adaptive (Lü, Xing, Hughes, and Wang, 2018). Although those with higher extraversion initially show lower responses to minor stressors, a reverse effect is observed when the magnitude of the stressor is increased significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this, in the present study, watching a film clip depicting marital conflict, a mental arithmetic task, and a speech task were used to explore interaction effects between RSA reactivity and marital conflict in regard to predicting internalizing problems. These tasks were chosen because they are common stress-induction stimuli used in reactivity protocols (Dickerson and Kemeny, 2004; Lü et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%