“…Over the past three decades, the countries where these travelers hail from, called ‘countries of origin’ or ‘sending countries,’ have proposed and implemented various measures to deter and detect transnational sex offenders, such as revoking the passport of known sex offenders (e.g., Hall, 2011). In addition to the United States (e.g., Andrews, 2004; Atwell, 2014; Fraley, 2005; Giordanella, 1998), Canada and Japan (Svensson, 2006), and Australia (e.g., Curley, 2019; Curley and Stanley, 2016; David, 2000; Ireland-Piper, 2011; McNicol and Schloenhardt, 2012), some European countries, including the Netherlands, 1 have enabled extraterritorial application of their criminal laws to prosecute their nationals for child sexual abuse crimes committed abroad (e.g., Fredette, 2009; Khan, 2004; Koops et al, 2017; Seabrook, 2000). In practice, however, sending countries largely abstain from extraterritorial prosecution, and typically only utilize this possibility when both evidence and resources are sufficient but local authorities are unable or unwilling to prosecute offenders (Curley, 2014).…”