2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-005-9010-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrapolation algorithm for affine-convex feasibility problems

Abstract: The convex feasibility problem under consideration is to find a common point of a countable family of closed affine subspaces and convex sets in a Hilbert space. To solve such problems, we propose a general parallel block-iterative algorithmic framework in which the affine subspaces are exploited to introduce extrapolated over-relaxations. This framework encompasses a wide range of projection, subgradient projection, proximal, and fixed point methods encountered in various branches of applied mathematics. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case where m is large and each of the sets X i has a simple form, incremental methods that make successive projections on the component sets X i have a long history (see e.g., Gubin et al [25], and recent papers such as Bauschke [6], Bauschke et al [2,3], and Cegielski and Suchocka [19], and their bibliographies). We may consider the following generalized version of the classical feasibility problem,…”
Section: Iterated Projection Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the case where m is large and each of the sets X i has a simple form, incremental methods that make successive projections on the component sets X i have a long history (see e.g., Gubin et al [25], and recent papers such as Bauschke [6], Bauschke et al [2,3], and Cegielski and Suchocka [19], and their bibliographies). We may consider the following generalized version of the classical feasibility problem,…”
Section: Iterated Projection Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Here {α k } is a positive scalar sequence, and we assume that each f i : n → is a convex function and X is a closed convex set. The motivation for this method is that with a favorable structure of the components, the proximal iteration (3) may be obtained in closed form or be relatively simple, in which case it may be preferable to a gradient or subgradient iteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of projection methods is vast and we can only mention here a few recent works that can give the reader some good starting points. Such a list includes, among many others, the paper of Lakshminarayanan and Lent [58] on the SIRT method, the works of Crombez [43,46], the connection with variational inequalities, see, e.g., Noor [62], Yamada's [68] which is motivated by real-world problems of signal processing, and the many contributions of Bauschke and Combettes, see, e.g., Bauschke, Combettes and Kruk [7] and references therein. Consult Bauschke and Borwein [4] and Censor and Zenios [33,Chapter 5] for a tutorial review and a book chapter, respectively.…”
Section: Projection Methods: Advantages and Earlier Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xiii-xiv] and the references therein), it is natural to consider also the CFP with infinitely many sets appearing in the formulation of the problem, and this is done in the present paper. A few other works considering the CFP with infinitely many sets exist, for instance, [10,12,44] and [23,25], but some do not consider the SSP.…”
Section: The Number Of Involved Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%