The fundamental energy gap of a periodic solid distinguishes insulators from metals and characterizes low-energy single-electron excitations. However, the gap in the band structure of the exact multiplicative Kohn-Sham (KS) potential substantially underestimates the fundamental gap, a major limitation of KS densityfunctional theory. Here, we give a simple proof of a theorem: In generalized KS theory (GKS), the band gap of an extended system equals the fundamental gap for the approximate functional if the GKS potential operator is continuous and the density change is delocalized when an electron or hole is added. Our theorem explains how GKS band gaps from metageneralized gradient approximations (meta-GGAs) and hybrid functionals can be more realistic than those from GGAs or even from the exact KS potential. The theorem also follows from earlier work. The band edges in the GKS one-electron spectrum are also related to measurable energies. A linear chain of hydrogen molecules, solid aluminum arsenide, and solid argon provide numerical illustrations. T he most basic property of a periodic solid is its fundamental energy gap G, which vanishes for a metal but is positive for semiconductors and other insulators. G dominates many properties. As the unbound limit of an exciton series, G is an excitation energy of the neutral solid, but it is defined here as a difference of ground-state energies: If EðMÞ is the ground-state energy for a solid with a fixed number of nuclei and M electrons, and if M = N for electrical neutrality, thenis the difference between the first ionization energy IðNÞ and the first electron affinity AðNÞ of the neutral solid. Whereas I and A can be measured for a macroscopic solid, they can be computed directly (as ground-state energy differences) either by starting from finite clusters and extrapolating to infinite cluster size or (for I-A) by starting from a finite number of primitive unit cells, with periodic boundary condition on the surface of this finite collection, and extrapolating to an infinite number. Here we shall follow both approaches, which have been discussed in a recent study (1). (The energy to remove an electron to infinite separation cannot depend upon the crystal face through which it is removed, although the energy to remove an electron to a macroscopic separation, but much smaller than the dimensions of that face, may so depend. The gap is of course a bulk property.)
Band-Gap Problem in Kohn-Sham Density-Functional TheoryKohn-Sham density-functional theory (2, 3) is a formally exact way to compute the ground-state energy and electron density of M interacting electrons in a multiplicative external potential. This theory sets up a fictitious system of noninteracting electrons with the same ground-state density as the real interacting system, found by solving self-consistent one-electron Schrödinger equations. These electrons move in a multiplicative effective Kohn-Sham (KS) potential, the sum of the external and Hartree potentials and the derivative of the density functional for...