2005
DOI: 10.1080/02841850510021058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrapedicular approach of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of upper and mid‐thoracic vertebral compression fracture

Abstract: S. Extrapedicular approach of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of upper and mid-thoracic vertebral compression fracture. Acta Radiol 2005;46:280-287.Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcome of the extrapedicular approach of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for upper and mid-thoracic vertebral compression fractures in patients. Material and Methods: Extrapedicular vertebroplasty was performed in painful compression fractures at T4-T8 levels. The assessment criteria were changes over time in visual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The close proximity of the transpedicular approach to the spinal cord suggests a higher risk of spinal cord injury compared to the extrapedicular approach. Specific complications in the extrapedicular approach are rib fractures, pleural tears, pneumothorax or paraspinous haematoma [13] . For kyphoplasty, the standard bilateral transpedicular cannulation is described from T10 to L5 and for vertebroplasty from T5 or T6 to L5 [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close proximity of the transpedicular approach to the spinal cord suggests a higher risk of spinal cord injury compared to the extrapedicular approach. Specific complications in the extrapedicular approach are rib fractures, pleural tears, pneumothorax or paraspinous haematoma [13] . For kyphoplasty, the standard bilateral transpedicular cannulation is described from T10 to L5 and for vertebroplasty from T5 or T6 to L5 [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some scholars have used the extrapedicular approach and TPRPA in clinical practice, but extrapedicular approach is mainly used in cases with mid-thoracic vertebra or thin pedicle due to the risk of vascular injury [14][15][16][17][18] . Yan L, et, al. reported TPRPA is a relatively safe and effective approach with less radiation dosage and shorter surgical time [19,20] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 These patients should be operated under neuromonitoring or local anesthesia with an anterior delivery of cement, similarly to those with upper thoracic or cervical spine fractures. 39 Recently, Sun et al 40 reviewed the results of vertebroplasty for painful spinal metastasis in 43 patients with epidural encroachment in whom open surgery was not available due to poor general medical status and limited life expectancy. In this series, 32% presented signs of cord or cauda equina compression preoperatively.…”
Section: Indications and Contra-indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Also, a unilateral extra-pedicular approach has been described in the literature with good results. 39 The unilateral transpedicular approach has been proposed in order to reduce operative time, costs, radiation exposure and risk of medial pedicular violations. 54 Another theoretical benefit of the unilateral approach is that it reduces the possibility of cement leakage through the canula tract, which could cause nerve injury.…”
Section: Bilateral Versus Unilateral Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%