1982
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(82)90050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extranodular growth of Frankia on Casuarina equisetifolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because sp(-) strains produce few if any spores within nodules, their persistence at a given site probably depends on saprophytic growth in soil. Growth within the rhizosphere (Diem et al, 1982;Lalonde et al, 1981) may also contribute to their maintenance.…”
Section: Distribution Of Sp( + ) and Sp(-) Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because sp(-) strains produce few if any spores within nodules, their persistence at a given site probably depends on saprophytic growth in soil. Growth within the rhizosphere (Diem et al, 1982;Lalonde et al, 1981) may also contribute to their maintenance.…”
Section: Distribution Of Sp( + ) and Sp(-) Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, they are important in the establishment and/or the effectiveness of the nitrogen-fixing symbioses, as co actors, and as potential sources of novel natural products. Atypical Frankia isolates inhabiting cortical layer have been obtained from unpeeled Casuarina nodules (Nazaret et al 1989), which are unable to nodulate Casuarina, their original hosts, but can nodulate members of the Elaeagnaceae (Diem et al 1982;Diem and Dommergues 1983). Ramirez-Saad et al (1998) demonstrated that root nodules of Ceanothus caeruleus contain, beside the typical Frankia endophyte, phylogenetically related non nitrogen-fixing and non-nodulating actinobacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of infectious Frankia in soil has been associated with the presence of actinorhizal plants (Arveby and Huss-Danell, 1988;Dawson and Klemp, 1987;Oremus, 1980;Smolander, 1990) and their removal can result in a decrease in infectious Frankia (Wollum et al, 1968). The abundance of infectious Frankia near roots of actinorhizal plants is probably due to rhizosphere interactions (Diem et al, 1982;Vergnaud et al, 1985) and root-nodule decomposition (Oremus, 1980), which may release infectious Frankia. Frankia can also survive in the soil in the absence of actinorhizal plants (Dawson and Klemp, 1987;Houwers and Akkermans, 1981;Paschke and Dawson, 1992b;Young et al, 1992) and can apparently flourish under certain non-host plants such as birch (Paschke and Dawson, 1992a;Smolander, 1990;Smolander et al, 1990), indicating that the ability of vegetation to enhance the Frankia infectious capacity of soil is not limited to actinorhizal plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%