2007
DOI: 10.1309/903ut10vq3lc7b8l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extramural Cancer Deposits Without Nodal Structure in Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: To establish an optimal categorization of cancer deposits without lymph node structure (extranodal cancer deposits [EX]) in a prognostic staging system, we analyzed 1,027 cases in which patients underwent potentially curative surgery for advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. EX was classified as vascular invasion-type (VAS) or non-VAS.A total of 512 foci of EX were identified in 205 patients (20.0%), with VAS and non-VAS found in 68 and 182 patients, respectively. The hazard ratio for patients with nodal involve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the short follow-up times in the data, mesenteric tumor deposits did appear to have an impact on patient prognosis. In addition to significant associations with other established indicators of poor prognosis, small intestine neuroendocrine tumor patients with tumor deposits experienced a progression/disease-specific death rate 4.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.3, 12,5) times higher than patients without deposits, consistent with the hazard ratios of 2.5, 4.7, and 8.0 reported by Ueno et al for survival for three different types of colorectal deposits (24). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Notwithstanding the short follow-up times in the data, mesenteric tumor deposits did appear to have an impact on patient prognosis. In addition to significant associations with other established indicators of poor prognosis, small intestine neuroendocrine tumor patients with tumor deposits experienced a progression/disease-specific death rate 4.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.3, 12,5) times higher than patients without deposits, consistent with the hazard ratios of 2.5, 4.7, and 8.0 reported by Ueno et al for survival for three different types of colorectal deposits (24). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…All resected specimens were diagnosed according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification (26,27). Following surgery, the patients were followed-up using serological examinations, including serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 125, and imaging modalities, such as abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray, every 3–6 months.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the TNM classification (26,27), the pathological staging of the tumor in was stage IIIa [well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; pT3pN1M0; residual tumor (R) 0]. In May 2000, the CEA level of the patient had increased to 16 ng/ml (normal range, 0.0–4.0 ng/ml).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations