2019
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6814a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extragenital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among Community Venue–Attending Men Who Have Sex with Men — Five Cities, United States, 2017

Abstract: Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) disproportionately affect gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States ( 1 ). Because chlamydia and gonorrhea at extragenital (rectal and pharyngeal) anatomic sites are often asymptomatic, these anatomic sites serve as a reservoir of infection, which might contribute to gonococcal antimicrobial resistance ( 2 ) and increased risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and acq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have compared the prevalence of extragenital gonorrhoea and chlamydia in MSM by HIV status. A US study reported that HIV‐positive MSM had a higher prevalence of anorectal gonorrhoea (8.2% vs. 3.3%) and anorectal chlamydia (9.0% vs. 6.6%) than HIV‐negative MSM; however, the prevalence was similar in both groups for oropharyngeal infection (that is oropharyngeal gonorrhoea: 5.2% in HIV‐positive vs. 4.3% in HIV‐negative; oropharyngeal chlamydia: 1.6% in HIV‐positive vs. 1.3% in HIV‐negative) . These findings are consistent with another study conducted in Melbourne, Australia, showing that the prevalence of anorectal gonorrhoea was higher in HIV‐positive MSM (15.4%) than in HIV‐negative MSM (7.3%) but the prevalence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea was similar in both in HIV‐positive MSM (9.9%) and HIV‐negative MSM (8.1%) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have compared the prevalence of extragenital gonorrhoea and chlamydia in MSM by HIV status. A US study reported that HIV‐positive MSM had a higher prevalence of anorectal gonorrhoea (8.2% vs. 3.3%) and anorectal chlamydia (9.0% vs. 6.6%) than HIV‐negative MSM; however, the prevalence was similar in both groups for oropharyngeal infection (that is oropharyngeal gonorrhoea: 5.2% in HIV‐positive vs. 4.3% in HIV‐negative; oropharyngeal chlamydia: 1.6% in HIV‐positive vs. 1.3% in HIV‐negative) . These findings are consistent with another study conducted in Melbourne, Australia, showing that the prevalence of anorectal gonorrhoea was higher in HIV‐positive MSM (15.4%) than in HIV‐negative MSM (7.3%) but the prevalence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea was similar in both in HIV‐positive MSM (9.9%) and HIV‐negative MSM (8.1%) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both gonorrhoea and chlamydia until recently were thought to be mainly transmitted through condomless penetrative intercourse such as penile‐vaginal, penile‐anal and oral sex . However, in the context of rising STI rates and ineffective interventions, it is important to review the transmission of both infections particularly at extragenital sites in MSM which are largely asymptomatic .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine STI screening among MSM remains suboptimal, particularly at extragenital (pharynx and rectum) sites, where STIs are frequently asymptomatic [6–9, 12]. A recent venue-based study estimated that 1 in 8 MSM had prevalent extragenital NG or CT infection and one-third reported not having been tested for STIs in the past 12 months, suggesting that high-risk MSM were not being screened per CDC recommendations [10]. Behavioral risk is estimated to have little impact on STI screening frequency, with the screening rate increasing only 1.4% per additional anal sex partner in 1 national study [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These infections can be effectively diagnosed and treated at all sites of sexual exposure, but screening has focused on urogenital testing [6–8]. Asymptomatic infections, particularly rectal, that contribute to ongoing STI transmission are often missed unless detected through routine screening [9, 10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture detection is available for testing at extragenital sites, but the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is more sensitive than cell cultures and is the preferred method for laboratory detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea. Extragenital screening using NAAT is available at many local, state, and commercial laboratories and is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009;Johnson Jones et al, 2019;U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%