2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracts from mango peel by-product obtained by supercritical CO2 and pressurized solvent processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
2
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
32
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all the varieties, Langra was reported to have highest phenolic content of 60.48 mg GAE/g, which could be result of enzymatic reactions during different ripening stages of mango cultivars. The studies conducted by Garcia‐Mendoza, Paula, Paviani, Cabral, and Martinez‐Correa () and Liu, Zhang, Ma, and Fu () revealed the total phenolic content in the range of 15.80–41.63 and 1.68–13.28 mg GAE/g, respectively, which is lower than that of reported in the present study. The higher content of total phenolics might be due to more retention of thermo‐labile bioactive compounds by LN 2 ‐aided grinding.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Among all the varieties, Langra was reported to have highest phenolic content of 60.48 mg GAE/g, which could be result of enzymatic reactions during different ripening stages of mango cultivars. The studies conducted by Garcia‐Mendoza, Paula, Paviani, Cabral, and Martinez‐Correa () and Liu, Zhang, Ma, and Fu () revealed the total phenolic content in the range of 15.80–41.63 and 1.68–13.28 mg GAE/g, respectively, which is lower than that of reported in the present study. The higher content of total phenolics might be due to more retention of thermo‐labile bioactive compounds by LN 2 ‐aided grinding.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Bioactive compounds in mango peel are generally extracted via the following methods: extraction with 80% ethanol by sonication for 3 days at room temperature [18]; extraction performed three times with methanol, for 3 h per time [19]; extraction with 95% ethanol three times, 72 h per time [20]; extraction with acetone or ethyl acetate for up to 20 h [21][22][23]; extraction by microwave-assisted method [24,25]; or extraction with supercritical CO 2 , followed by pressurized ethanol [26]. However, these methods generally involve the use of a large volume of solvents, require a long extraction time, consume a lot of energy, are costly, and sometimes are not eco-friendly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, process integration includes prior unit operation (fermentation, extraction, enzyme pre-treatment, physical fractionation or size reduction) followed by sub-or supercritical extraction or fractionation processes (supercritical chromatography, enzymatic conversion, precipitation and coating of solutes, among others) [45]. Regarding this approach, recent reports suggest the combined use of extraction processes, such as supercritical CO 2 followed by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE, employing ethanol and water) for improving the recovery of compounds with different polarities and bio-functionalities [44,48,49,50]. Another exceptionally versatile process that has been used in the integrated SF-processes is the Supercritical Antisolvent Fractionation (SAF), which benefits from the antisolvent properties of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO 2 ) and allows for the precipitation of insoluble compounds in the SC-CO 2 organic solution mixture [45,51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%