2011
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201100675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction optimization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by alcoholic‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and their determination by HPLC

Abstract: A sensitive method for the extraction and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using alcoholic-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (AA-DLLME) and HPLC was developed. The extraction procedure was based on alcoholic solvents for both extraction and dispersive solvents. The effective parameters (type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, amount of salt and stirring time) on the extraction recovery were studied and optimized utilizing factorial design (FD) and central … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In microextraction techniques that employ solvents that are less dense than water, volumes of extractors between 8 and 145 mL have been used [39,40].…”
Section: Extractor Solvent Volume Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In microextraction techniques that employ solvents that are less dense than water, volumes of extractors between 8 and 145 mL have been used [39,40].…”
Section: Extractor Solvent Volume Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the references , various extraction methods were used for analysis of PAHs in the water samples that mostly used organic solvent during the extraction procedure (Table ), but there is no report of the use of PEG‐g‐MWCNTs SBSE‐MD for the extraction of PAHs from aqueous samples .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatemi et al , have used an “alcohol ‐ assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction” (AA ‐ DLLME) method to determine six PAHs in water samples. The extraction solvents were lighter than water alcohols and the dispersive solvents were methanol, ethanol or 1‐propanol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%