2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of viral nucleic acids: Comparison of five automated nucleic acid extraction platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The screening test must include a sample preparation method that ensures high recovery of nucleic acids and sufficient purity of clinical samples to control inhibitors (7,8 ). Comparative performance studies of automated extraction platforms have demonstrated the direct correlation between the performance of the extraction system and the imprecision of a molecular assay (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: © 2014 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening test must include a sample preparation method that ensures high recovery of nucleic acids and sufficient purity of clinical samples to control inhibitors (7,8 ). Comparative performance studies of automated extraction platforms have demonstrated the direct correlation between the performance of the extraction system and the imprecision of a molecular assay (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: © 2014 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated methods are generally just as effective as manual methods (65 ). Many valuable comparisons of methods have been published (66,67 ) but are usually limited to only a few methods and a single sample target combination. Most comparisons demonstrate that there is not a big difference between preparation methods.…”
Section: Selecting From Current Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMV, EBV and adenovirus reactivation was monitored by twice-weekly DNA PCR monitoring [20]. CMV reactivation (>400 copies/ml) was treated pre-emptively with Ganciclovir.…”
Section: Pre-transplant Work-up and Supportive Carementioning
confidence: 99%