2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.03.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of uranium (VI) by 1.1M tri-n-butylphosphate/ionic liquid and the feasibility of recovery by direct electrodeposition from organic phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
5
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6.1 as a function of initial nitric acid concentration for TBP/[C 4 mim][NTf 2 ] (30 % v/v). As it can be seen the distribution coefficient is high at low nitric acids concentrations (0.01 M), decreases to its lowest level at [HNO 3 ] aq,init = 1 M, followed by an increase up to concentration of 3 M. Similar trends were found by other investigators as well (Giridhar et al 2008, Billard et al 2011b) for [C 4 mim][NTf 2 ], even though some experimental details, i.e. dioxouranium(VI) concentration, temperature, and experimental procedure for phase preparation were not the same from one work to the other.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…6.1 as a function of initial nitric acid concentration for TBP/[C 4 mim][NTf 2 ] (30 % v/v). As it can be seen the distribution coefficient is high at low nitric acids concentrations (0.01 M), decreases to its lowest level at [HNO 3 ] aq,init = 1 M, followed by an increase up to concentration of 3 M. Similar trends were found by other investigators as well (Giridhar et al 2008, Billard et al 2011b) for [C 4 mim][NTf 2 ], even though some experimental details, i.e. dioxouranium(VI) concentration, temperature, and experimental procedure for phase preparation were not the same from one work to the other.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…[31] Those data are compared in Figure 1w ith those obtained by contacting the same aqueous phases with aT BP/RTIL phase ([TBP] = All these data werea cquired in the absence of U VI .A lthough some researchers have shown that large amounts of metal may influence the distribution of all compoundsi nb iphasic systems, [40] we consider our data to be applicable to Ue xtraction, because Uranium distribution coefficients (D U )v alues are identical from U = 10 À2 m down to trace amounts. [25,29] As am atter of fact, our uranyl extraction data published previously [29] were obtained for [UO 2 2 + ] eq,ini = 10 À3 m,w hereas the characterization of extracted species had to be acquired at higher uranium concentrations ([UO 2 2 + ] eq,ini = 10 À3 m), owing to the detectionl imits.…”
Section: Effect Of Tbp In the Rtil Phase On The Solubility Of Rtil Iomentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This separation is made by the formation of the neutrals olvate UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 (TBP) 2 .Replacing the kerosene phase by an imidazolium-based or tetraalkyl-based RTIL induces ac hange in the uranium(VI)d istribution coefficient curve as af unction of the acid concentration, which exhibits a" boomerang" shape. [25,26] At low acid concentrations, the extraction of uranium is strongly dependento nt he length of the imidazolium or tetraalkylammonium alkyl chains, as shown by Dietz and Stepinski [27] and Murali et al [28] Several mechanisms were proposed to explain the data. At low acid concentrations,b oth groups are in agreement about the extraction of the solvate [UO 2 À by an anion exchange with one RTIL anion at high acid concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This organic extractant has very high affinity towards uranium, plutonium, thorium, zirconium, and so forth and hence is used frequently for their separation as well as purification. [15][16][17] The high affinity of TBP towards uranium is due to presence of P═O bond in it, which forms complex with uranyl ion (UO 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%