2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23678-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of Teeth Shapes from Orthopantomograms for Forensic Human Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies in the literature (Jain et al, 2003;Abdel-Mottaleb et al, 2003;Zhou and Abdel-Mottaleb, 2005) directly use the intensity values via histogram projection in order to detect the teeth. However, in panoramic images the gap between the teeth disappears and occlusions may occur because of stitching partial X-ray images taken from the circular shaped jaw onto a 2-D image (Frejlichowski and Wanat, 2011). Therefore, instead of detecting the teeth with intensity change information, we propose using the textural and intensity descriptors together without requiring a model for each tooth.…”
Section: Tooth Detection Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the studies in the literature (Jain et al, 2003;Abdel-Mottaleb et al, 2003;Zhou and Abdel-Mottaleb, 2005) directly use the intensity values via histogram projection in order to detect the teeth. However, in panoramic images the gap between the teeth disappears and occlusions may occur because of stitching partial X-ray images taken from the circular shaped jaw onto a 2-D image (Frejlichowski and Wanat, 2011). Therefore, instead of detecting the teeth with intensity change information, we propose using the textural and intensity descriptors together without requiring a model for each tooth.…”
Section: Tooth Detection Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is tested on both bitewing and panoramic images; but, the system is semi-automatic. The system in (Jain et al, 2003) eliminates the inaccurate segmentation lines using the dental pulp which is also utilized in (Frejlichowski and Wanat, 2011) instead of the gaps between the teeth for separating the adjacent teeth. In (Lin et al, 2010), the SVM classifier runs with several geometrical tooth features to classify a tooth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M is the upper limit for linear enhancement and G is the constant gain. In our previous experiments [13,16,17] the best results were obtained when using the following combination of methods: 1) the averaging of the two Laplacian pyramid layers next to last, 2) unsharp filter on the second layer, 3) contrast enhancement, based on the eq. 2-3.…”
Section: Image Enhancement Segmentation and The Extraction Of Teeth mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the segmentation process the integral projections [15,16] or active contour models [12] have been applied so far. The extraction of particular teeth shapes is performed using active shapes [14], line scanning [15] or watersheds [17]. The first two algorithms were developed specifically for the intraoral images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the labels of the teeth are determined using the spatial relationships between the teeth. The system presented in [7] implements the watershed algorithm to segment the panoramic images into small regions and runs a fitness function with a set of features of each region for tooth detection. In the study of [3], support vector machines are used with several geometrical properties of the teeth for classification of the molar and the premolar teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%