2014
DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of incarcerated medial epicondyle from the elbow joint using conventional nerve stimulator: a case report

Abstract: IntroductionIncarceration of the medial epicondyle is a well-recognised sequelae following closed reduction of the elbow. Manipulation for extraction is not usually successful and hence an incarcerated medial epicondyle is usually an indication for open reduction and fixation.Case presentationWe describe a simple technique of closed reduction using a conventional nerve stimulator to extract an incarcerated medial epicondyle in a 13-year-old Caucasian boy. This technique uses contraction of the attached common … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 25 ] Though the medial epicondyle fracture is extra-articular and contributes little to the longitudinal growth of the humerus, incarceration of the medial epicondyle fragment following pediatric elbow dislocation leads to the risk of growth disturbance, articular incongruence, and disability. [ 26 , 27 ] In addition, the ulnar nerve enters the forearm as it passes behind the medial condyle. Fractures in this region place the ulnar nerve at considerable risk for injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25 ] Though the medial epicondyle fracture is extra-articular and contributes little to the longitudinal growth of the humerus, incarceration of the medial epicondyle fragment following pediatric elbow dislocation leads to the risk of growth disturbance, articular incongruence, and disability. [ 26 , 27 ] In addition, the ulnar nerve enters the forearm as it passes behind the medial condyle. Fractures in this region place the ulnar nerve at considerable risk for injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Dorman et al, described the use of a nerve stimulator to cause contraction of the flexor muscles, thereby indirectly reducing the incarcerated medial epicondyle. 12 Despite these described techniques, closed manipulation is often unsuccessful according to the literature, and forceful manipulation causes concern for articular cartilage damage and potential nerve injury. 9,12 Additionally, there are currently no longterm follow-up studies or large case series reporting either success rates or clinical outcomes of the various closed reduction methods that have been historically described.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%