2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0952.2003.00994.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of heavy metals in Sydney Harbour sediments using 1M HCl and 0.05M EDTA and implications for sediment‐quality guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because >80% of zinc and lead, in general, was extracted by 1 M HCl, as previously found for Sydney Harbour sediments (McCready et al, 2003). In contrast, substantially poorer correlations (Tables I-II) and relationships with toxicity were obtained with SEM copper than for copper extracted with concentrated acid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is because >80% of zinc and lead, in general, was extracted by 1 M HCl, as previously found for Sydney Harbour sediments (McCready et al, 2003). In contrast, substantially poorer correlations (Tables I-II) and relationships with toxicity were obtained with SEM copper than for copper extracted with concentrated acid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The later extractants may provide more realistic estimate of bioavailability than 1 M HCl. Although metal extractability by 1 M HCl in the sediment samples from Sydney Harbour was high (>80% for Zn and Pb; >60% for Cd and Cu) even then McCready, et al(2003) concluded that 1 M HCl may have application in evaluating potential bioavailability differences for these metals among sediments. The significant positive relationship between metals extracted with single extractants and mobile fraction of metals from sequential extraction procedure suggests that both sequential and single extractants are useful to predict metals bioavailability (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDTA is commonly used in soil studies due to a strong chelating ability for a variety of metals (Weimin et al 1992;Sun et al 2001), whereas HCl extraction releases inorganic and organic-associated metals by partial fractionation leaving non-bioavailable metals within the silicate mineral matrix intact (Weimin et al 1992;McCready et al 2003). Approximately 5 g soil in field condition was combined with 25 ml 0.05 M EDTA and 5 g with 25 ml 1 M HCl.…”
Section: Laboratory Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%