1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02389469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of cesium-137 from nitric acid medium in the presence of macrocyclic polyethers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dietz et al [14] have carried out Cs extraction using crown ether solutions in oxo diluents such as alcohols, ketones, ethers and carboxylic acids. We [15] have also reported the extraction of 137 Cs from the nitric acid medium using several di-benzo-18-crown-6 (DB18C6) derivatives. Structures Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dietz et al [14] have carried out Cs extraction using crown ether solutions in oxo diluents such as alcohols, ketones, ethers and carboxylic acids. We [15] have also reported the extraction of 137 Cs from the nitric acid medium using several di-benzo-18-crown-6 (DB18C6) derivatives. Structures Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among the separation methods employed for the recovery of Cs(I) from radioactive waste solutions, solvent extraction methods have been particularly attractive because of their rapidity, ease of operation and large through put [3]. Solvent extraction methods involving exotic reagents such as crown ethers, calixarenes and calix [4]crowns have shown great promise for caesium recovery from the acidic waste solutions [4][5][6][7]. Calix [4]crown molecules (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the removal of cesium radionuclides from EXPERIMENTAL aquatic media is a priority problem of environmental safety. The methods predominantly used for decontamination of radioactively contaminated waters, in particular, of nuclear effluents, include extraction, chemical precipitation, coagulation, ion exchange, sorption, electrochemical, and membrane methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Sorption is widely used and is a cheaper method than other physicochemical decontamination methods requiring additional expenditures and specific chemical reagents, which restricts their wide-scale use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%