2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction methods of red blood cell membrane proteins for Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology (MudPIT) analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dysferlin has been well studied because of its involvement in forms of muscular dystrophy but it has never been reported to be present in the RBC membrane in previous proteome analyses. [24], [25], [26], [27] Consistent with these earlier results, we did not detect dysferlin in any of the control donor RBC membranes. We used confocal microscopy to evaluate the location of dysferlin in the RBCs of DBA patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Dysferlin has been well studied because of its involvement in forms of muscular dystrophy but it has never been reported to be present in the RBC membrane in previous proteome analyses. [24], [25], [26], [27] Consistent with these earlier results, we did not detect dysferlin in any of the control donor RBC membranes. We used confocal microscopy to evaluate the location of dysferlin in the RBCs of DBA patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The one exception is a proteomics study by De Palma and co-workers that employed Triton extraction. However, that study used a low concentration of Triton-X-100 on membranes where the surface had been “shaved” using trypsin [35], which most likely affected the composition of the resulting membrane skeletons. Interestingly, they reported several unusual proteins associated with the erythrocyte membrane cytoskeleton, including subunits of chaperones containing T Complex Protein 1(TCP1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques include white ghost (WG) analysis on 1-[1] or 2-DE gels,[2] in-solution digestion of four RBC fractions (white ghosts, cytoplasmic proteins, inside out vesicles (IOV), and membrane skeletal proteins),[3] and membrane protein extraction with detergents followed by in-solution digestion for multidimensional protein identification technology analysis (MudPIT). [4] Several studies used 2-DE as the preferred fractionation method for LC-MS/MS analysis of the RBC proteome. [5–8] However, 2-DE analysis of hydrophobic membrane proteins is not ideal and detection can vary significantly depending upon individual protein structures and characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%