2012
DOI: 10.1051/orthodfr/2012019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction d’une incisive mandibulaire en orthodontie : indication, plan de traitement et gestion clinique pour différentes malocclusions

Abstract: Extraire une incisive mandibulaire est une approche thérapeutique qui fait débat, depuis quelques dizaines d’années, dans le monde de l’orthodontie. Publiés récemment, différents travaux ont apporté des informations substantielles et structurées qui pourraient nous aider à réaliser ce type de traitement dans des contextes choisis, en obtenant de bons résultats, de manière prévisible. Cet article se fixe pour objectif de résumer les informations disponib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical results of this case matched the ones reported in the literature which underline that the extraction of a mandibular incisor could be a good solution to correct the mandibular dental crowding, especially in cases of Class I molar and canine relationship with a 4 or 5 mm of anterior crowding and Class I or Class III tendency associated with an edge-to-edge occlusion of the incisors, anterior crossbite and minimal overbite, or open bite tendency [2][3][4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Clinical results of this case matched the ones reported in the literature which underline that the extraction of a mandibular incisor could be a good solution to correct the mandibular dental crowding, especially in cases of Class I molar and canine relationship with a 4 or 5 mm of anterior crowding and Class I or Class III tendency associated with an edge-to-edge occlusion of the incisors, anterior crossbite and minimal overbite, or open bite tendency [2][3][4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%