IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005 2005
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2005.1530184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction and interpretation of ring structures in images of biological hard tissues: application to fish age and growth estimation

Abstract: This paper presents a general framework for the automated estimation of age and growth from images of biological materials depicting concentric ring-like structures such as tree trunks, corals, bivalve seashells, fish scales or otoliths. This interpretation task can be seen as a ring segmentation issue, where growth rings are associated to image ridge and valley structures. This is stated as the Bayesian selection of a subset of partial ring curves extracted using a semi-local template-based growth-adapted sch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age was estimated by interpreting growth rings on 642 scales from 301 females (10.5 cm ≤ TL ≤ 26.7 cm, 16.05 g ≤ TW ≤ 278.45 g), 326 males (11.5 cm ≤ TL ≤ 26.1 cm, 22.73 g ≤ TW ≤ 300.80 g) and 15 immature individuals (10.4 ≤ TL ≤ 16.1 cm, 18.88 g ≤ TW ≤ 64.31 g). Scales were read using TNPC5 (Numerical treatment of calcified pieces) software (Fablet & Ogor, 2005). Readings were made by three independent investigations; the scales were used in subsequent analyses only when all three readings were in agreement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age was estimated by interpreting growth rings on 642 scales from 301 females (10.5 cm ≤ TL ≤ 26.7 cm, 16.05 g ≤ TW ≤ 278.45 g), 326 males (11.5 cm ≤ TL ≤ 26.1 cm, 22.73 g ≤ TW ≤ 300.80 g) and 15 immature individuals (10.4 ≤ TL ≤ 16.1 cm, 18.88 g ≤ TW ≤ 64.31 g). Scales were read using TNPC5 (Numerical treatment of calcified pieces) software (Fablet & Ogor, 2005). Readings were made by three independent investigations; the scales were used in subsequent analyses only when all three readings were in agreement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cefas = Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (UK), IMR = Institute of Marine Research (Norway), Difres = Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Ifremer = Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (France), MRI = Marine Research Institute (Iceland), AZTI = AZTI Technology Centre (Spain), NS = North Sea, NEA = northeast Arctic, FP = Faroe Plateau, EC = Eastern Channel (ICES area VIId), Biscay = Bay of Biscay, Prep = otolith preparation, W = whole, S = section. Faroe samples collected by the Fish Ageing by Otolith Shape Analysis (FAbOSA) project (Arneri et al 2002) vision journals (Caselles et al 1998, Guillaud et al 2002a,b, Cao & Fablet 2006 and presented at conferences (Rodin et al 1996, Benzinou et al 1997, Fablet et al 2003, Fablet 2005, Chessel et al 2006. Most research into automated image-based CAAGE undertaken in the 2000s was funded by the European Union, and the emphasis probably reflected the broader information and communication technology (ICT) research and development (R&D) agenda that existed at that time in the EU.…”
Section: Computer Vision Image Processing and Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from AFISA have been published in the form of an EU report only (Mahé 2009), although a subset of the work concerning Eastern Channel plaice feature widely in publications by Fablet and colleagues (Fablet 2005, 2006b, Fablet & Le Josse 2005. AFISA also analyse transect signals but employ a statistical framework and more complex pre-processing than do Robertson and colleagues (Morison et al 1998, Robertson & Morison 1999, 2001).…”
Section: The Need For Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%