Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction and identification methods of microplastics and nanoplastics in agricultural soil: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although compared to previous works (Table S4), our approach achieved a relatively low limit of detections (LODs) and quantifications (LOQs) of PVC, PS, and PET based on Pyr-GC-MS/MS (Table S5), the selected molecules, which represented thermally decomposed MPs in GC-MS, may have presented in the original components of PM 2.5 (Table S6). The existence of benzene/chlorobenzene, styrene, and benzoic acid, which were the indicator ions for PVC, PS, and PET in current work, respectively, have been confirmed in PM 2.5 and air. , Therefore, if these MPs want to be accurately detected in PM 2.5 using Pyr-GC-MS/MS, additional sample treatments might be needed, like density flotation, electrostatic separation, and alkaline/acid digestion. Yet, after direct pyrogenic decomposition of PM 2.5 samples, 1-octene could be used as the unique molecule indicator for the determination of PE-MP in GC-MS (Figure and Figure S1). The other pyrolytic product, 1-hexene, of PE-MP was also detected (Table S5), but its instrumental response was relatively low (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although compared to previous works (Table S4), our approach achieved a relatively low limit of detections (LODs) and quantifications (LOQs) of PVC, PS, and PET based on Pyr-GC-MS/MS (Table S5), the selected molecules, which represented thermally decomposed MPs in GC-MS, may have presented in the original components of PM 2.5 (Table S6). The existence of benzene/chlorobenzene, styrene, and benzoic acid, which were the indicator ions for PVC, PS, and PET in current work, respectively, have been confirmed in PM 2.5 and air. , Therefore, if these MPs want to be accurately detected in PM 2.5 using Pyr-GC-MS/MS, additional sample treatments might be needed, like density flotation, electrostatic separation, and alkaline/acid digestion. Yet, after direct pyrogenic decomposition of PM 2.5 samples, 1-octene could be used as the unique molecule indicator for the determination of PE-MP in GC-MS (Figure and Figure S1). The other pyrolytic product, 1-hexene, of PE-MP was also detected (Table S5), but its instrumental response was relatively low (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Concluding, notwithstanding that science has proven that MPs exist as a global problem, there are some important research gaps mainly concerning human health [37]. For this reason, there is also the need for a global, generalized, easy, and ecofriendly common protocol for the extraction and identification of MPs/NPs, starting from the air and soil [171] and moving onward to the rest of the food samples, such as honey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for measuring microplastics in solid organic matrices such as these typically involve a sequence of steps aimed at isolating, identifying, and characterizing the microplastics in each sample (Ruggero et al., 2020). Isolation methods include flotation, elutriation, centrifugation, digestion (with e.g., H 2 O 2 , Fenton's reagent), and sieving (Junhao et al., 2021; Ruggero et al., 2020). Identification methods include fluorescence microscopy, thermal degradation (e.g., TED–GC–MS, PY–GC–MS), spectroscopy (e.g., Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman) and visual analysis (with or without light microscopy) (Junhao et al., 2021; Ruggero et al., 2020).…”
Section: Microplastic Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation methods include flotation, elutriation, centrifugation, digestion (with e.g., H 2 O 2 , Fenton's reagent), and sieving (Junhao et al., 2021; Ruggero et al., 2020). Identification methods include fluorescence microscopy, thermal degradation (e.g., TED–GC–MS, PY–GC–MS), spectroscopy (e.g., Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman) and visual analysis (with or without light microscopy) (Junhao et al., 2021; Ruggero et al., 2020). It is common for multiple isolation and identification methodologies to be combined in series (Ruggero et al., 2020).…”
Section: Microplastic Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%