2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-021-02147-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction and Characterization of Fiber Treatment Inula viscosa Fibers as Potential Polymer Composite Reinforcement

Abstract: This research aims to analyze the newly discovered cellulosic ber from the bark of Dittrichia viscosa, or Inula viscosa (IV), and evaluate the effects of permanganate and alkali chemical treatments on the physical properties to improve the interfacial bonding between Inula viscosa reinforced polymer composites. These permanganate and alkali treatments are both e cacious in helping in reducing hydrophilicity and eliminating impurities from the ber surface, which has been con rmed by scanning electron microscope… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 shows the comparison of IFSS shear stress results for CM fibers with other fibers. We can say that the results obtained are close compared to the results of previous studies such as, Inula viscosa fibers, 48 Pineapple fibers, 49 Glass fibers, 50 Kevla fibers, 51 basalt fibers, 52 Glass fibers, 53 Agave sisalana fibers . 54
Figure 10.Force–displacement curve for droplet debonding.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 6 shows the comparison of IFSS shear stress results for CM fibers with other fibers. We can say that the results obtained are close compared to the results of previous studies such as, Inula viscosa fibers, 48 Pineapple fibers, 49 Glass fibers, 50 Kevla fibers, 51 basalt fibers, 52 Glass fibers, 53 Agave sisalana fibers . 54
Figure 10.Force–displacement curve for droplet debonding.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There are many factors that cause this discrepancy, among which are the increase in the roughness and surface area of the fibers, the length of the immersed resin and the different diameters of the fibers, which leads to the effect of mechanical cross linking between the fibers and the composite matrix. 48 The average IFSS for fiber-epoxy matrix combination is 9.82 ± 2.35 MPa. Table 6 shows the comparison of IFSS shear stress results for CM fibers with other fibers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…MAF and other cellulosic fibers possess an elevated amount of C and O component than other elements. [ 59 ] Apart from carbon and oxygen, Mg, Al, P, S, K, and Ca are also seen in Figure 5 and Table 3. These additional elements suggested the presence of pollution and non‐crystalline components on the MAF.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Characterization Of Mafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large band observed between 3600-3000 cm À1 is associated with the hydrogen bonded O-H (Hydroxyl group) stretching vibration from the cellulose structure of MS. 14,59 The absorption peaks at 2912 cm À1 and 2873 cm À1 are the characteristic of the C-H stretching vibration from CH and CH 2 group respectively. 23 Whilst the absorbance band located at 1733 cm À1 is a consequence of the stretching vibration of the (C = O) carbonyl groups of hemicellulose, lignin and extractives. 19,22,60 The peak at 1625 cm À1 is attributed to the C = C stretching of the a Alkenes groups of lignin.…”
Section: Atr-ftir Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a very large amount of research on the characterization of new fibers has been established. These new fibers were extracted from the leaf, 14,15 the stem, [19][20][21] the bark, [22][23][24] the fruits 25,26 or from the roots of a plant. [27][28][29] To our knowledge, there is unfortunately no study yet on the characterization of physical, chemical and mechanical properties of Malva sylvestris fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%