DOI: 10.29007/g29m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Value From Complex High-Frequency Multivariate Water Quality Data: Exploring Routinely Collected Operational Data

Abstract: Drinking water treatment works are increasingly placed under external stressors including climatic variability, land use and management, and pollution incidents. Routine high-frequency water quality monitoring is an integral part of operational control and is used to inform the treatment process and support the identification of risks. However, in order to improve decision making using the complex, time-series of water quality data that are generated (and typically archived), there must be distinction between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic extraction of rainfall‐runoff events and corresponding metrics was undertaken using a semi‐automated rules‐based approach for the identification and pairing of rainfall and flow geometries from sub‐hourly observations (Ashe et al, 2019; Deasy et al, 2009; Glendell et al, 2014; Ladson et al, 2013; Luscombe, 2014; Puttock et al, 2017) summarized in Figure 2. Data were sub‐sampled at 15 min intervals and pre‐processed for quality control (Ashe et al, 2019). The automated systematic approach for flow event extraction is sensitive to low flow variability in the discharge time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic extraction of rainfall‐runoff events and corresponding metrics was undertaken using a semi‐automated rules‐based approach for the identification and pairing of rainfall and flow geometries from sub‐hourly observations (Ashe et al, 2019; Deasy et al, 2009; Glendell et al, 2014; Ladson et al, 2013; Luscombe, 2014; Puttock et al, 2017) summarized in Figure 2. Data were sub‐sampled at 15 min intervals and pre‐processed for quality control (Ashe et al, 2019). The automated systematic approach for flow event extraction is sensitive to low flow variability in the discharge time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%