2004
DOI: 10.2469/dig.v34.n4.1588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting the Expected Path of Monetary Policy from Futures Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the presence of (possibly time‐varying) risk premia in these market prices may lead to systematically biased forecasts of the future path of monetary policy, as argued by Piazzesi and Swanson () in particular. Other studies, including Durham () and Sack (), however, find only small variation in risk premia in fed funds futures. In addition, as noted by Piazzesi and Swanson (), risk premia seem to change primarily at (relatively low) business‐cycle frequencies, suggesting that our approach of analysing one‐day changes in fed funds futures prices may mitigate the role of such ‘unobserved’ risk premia, by ‘differencing out’ their effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, the presence of (possibly time‐varying) risk premia in these market prices may lead to systematically biased forecasts of the future path of monetary policy, as argued by Piazzesi and Swanson () in particular. Other studies, including Durham () and Sack (), however, find only small variation in risk premia in fed funds futures. In addition, as noted by Piazzesi and Swanson (), risk premia seem to change primarily at (relatively low) business‐cycle frequencies, suggesting that our approach of analysing one‐day changes in fed funds futures prices may mitigate the role of such ‘unobserved’ risk premia, by ‘differencing out’ their effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is now widely accepted (Bernanke & Kuttner, 2005;Faust, Swanson, & Wright, 2004;Krueger & Kuttner, 1996;Kuttner, 2001;Rudebusch, 1998;Sack, 2004;Söderström, 2001;Sultan, 2005) that federal funds futures contain useful information for predicting monetary policy. There are several ways to calculate policy surprise using the federal funds futures rate.…”
Section: Calculation Of Monetary Policy Surprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no FOMC meeting in the second month, then, the policy surprise in that month is the same as the market surpise from the first month (Surprise m1), assuming that the term premium is unchanged between the first and the second months. Sack (2004) notes that constant term premium at the short end of the yield curve is supported empirically.…”
Section: A No Fomc Meeting In Monthmentioning
confidence: 99%