2003
DOI: 10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting signals of predation and competition from paired plankton time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the signals identified in this study (e.g. predation signals P1, P3 and P4) have also been identified as important signals in simulated data and in timeseries data from freshwater populations of zooplankton (Sandvik et al 2003), suggesting the presence of universal signals for some interactions. In the freshwater time series data, signals of predation could have resulted from a decrease in the prey population due to increased predation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the signals identified in this study (e.g. predation signals P1, P3 and P4) have also been identified as important signals in simulated data and in timeseries data from freshwater populations of zooplankton (Sandvik et al 2003), suggesting the presence of universal signals for some interactions. In the freshwater time series data, signals of predation could have resulted from a decrease in the prey population due to increased predation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…predation signals P1, P3 and P4) have also been identified as important signals in simulated data (Sandvik et al. 2002) and in time‐series data from freshwater populations of zooplankton (Sandvik et al. 2003), suggesting the presence of universal signals for some interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method extracts quantitative variables that characterise species interactions. An extension of the Key Factor Method, called the Angle Frequency Method, was developed slightly laterand tested in modelling studies (Seip and Pleym 2000;Sandvik et al 2002) and observational studies (Sandvik et al 2003;Sandvik et al 2004).…”
Section: Phase Portraitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has some advantages over strictly experimental approaches, such as species removals: in principle, the interaction strengths between all species pairs in a community can be estimated with one experiment (rather than requiring a comprehensive set of single-species removals), and estimates of direct pairwise interaction strengths are not confounded by indirect effects [9]. Recent applications include tide pool fish communities [11], freshwater plankton communities [1214], the wolf-moose interaction in Isle Royale National Park [15,16], forest insects [1719], and laboratory systems using microbes [2024] and insects [25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%