2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting roads from dense point clouds in large scale urban environment

Abstract: This paper describes a method for extracting roads from a large scale unstructured 3D point cloud of an urban environment consisting of many superimposed scans taken at different times. Given a road map and a point cloud, our system automatically separates road surfaces from the rest of the point cloud. Starting with an approximate map of the road network given in the form of 2D intersection locations connected by polylines, we first produce a 3D representation of the map by optimizing Cardinal splines to mini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(iv) Road modeling Studies of road extraction usually use images ( [23][24][25]), ALS ( [26][27][28]) or both ( [29,30]) as data sources. Currently, certain methods based on MLS data are also available: Goulette et al [31], Kukko [32], Jaakkola et al [33] and Pu et al [21].…”
Section: (I) Building Extraction and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Road modeling Studies of road extraction usually use images ( [23][24][25]), ALS ( [26][27][28]) or both ( [29,30]) as data sources. Currently, certain methods based on MLS data are also available: Goulette et al [31], Kukko [32], Jaakkola et al [33] and Pu et al [21].…”
Section: (I) Building Extraction and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misdetections and over-detections on the street surface are evaluated in Bin et al [30], however, they are calculated based on the detection of points, rather than based on the surfaces. Completeness and correctness are reported in Boyko and Funkhouser [26] in a similar way to this study, although a 0.5 m × 0.5 m grid is used for surface comparisons. Completeness is 94%, and correctness is 86%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, Zhao et al [28], Smadja et al [29] and Guan et al [35] show methods for automatically identifying road points from MLS data, but their performance is not assessed. Boyko and Funkhouser, and Bin et al [26,30] are focused on the detection of the road surface, but limited to the presence of curbs. Misdetections and over-detections on the street surface are evaluated in Bin et al [30], however, they are calculated based on the detection of points, rather than based on the surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manually delineated roads are shown in Figure 7, which presents the extracted roads for comparison. The following three widely accepted evaluation measures are used to evaluate how well our road extraction results match the ground-truth data set [4,5,[28][29][30]. …”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manually delineated roads are shown in Figure 7, which presents the extracted roads for comparison. The following three widely accepted evaluation measures are used to evaluate how well our road extraction results match the ground-truth data set [4,5,[28][29][30]. The following three widely accepted evaluation measures are used to evaluate how well our road extraction results match the ground-truth data set [4,5,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%