“…As can be seen in Table 12, D24WHFSS-based UMRTPFs 1:28 have better performance in TSP than 3MWHFSSs OFs and 3MCWHFSSs OFs . According to Table 12, the obtained results manifested the D24WHFSS by selecting 88-cycles of 28VTTFs (See Table 8, last row), which has better performance (Acc, TPR, and TNR) than mRMR OFs (9 cycles-4VTTFs), FCBF OFs , ReliefF OFs , and BMHFSS OFs (9 cycles-3VTTFs) [19], CPQHFSS OFs (48 cycles-28VTTFs [22]), and PITHS OFs (24 cycles-18VTTFs [23]). Based on the TPT index, the obtained results (See Table 13) show that the coupling D24WHFSS OFs and SVM RBF has a higher TPT (102.607 ms) than SVM RBF -3MWHFSSs OFs (SVM RBF -mRMR OFs : 68.793 ms, SVM RBF -FCBF OFs : 68.930 ms, SVM RBF -ReliefF OFs : 68.910 ms) and SVM RBF -BMHFSS OFs with 52.948 ms. Also, SVM RBF -D24WHFSS OFs has lower TPT than SVM RBF -PITHS OFs with 152.591 ms and SVM RBF -CPQHFSS OFs with 152.525 ms.…”