2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w8-429-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Dimensions and Locations of Doors, Windows, and Door Thresholds Out of Mobile Lidar Data Using Object Detection to Estimate the Impact of Floods

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Increasing urbanisation, changes in land use (e.g., more impervious area) and climate change have all led to an increasing frequency and severity of flood events and increased socio-economic impact. In order to deploy an urban flood disaster and risk management system, it is necessary to know what the consequences of a specific urban flood event are to adapt to a potential event and prepare for its impact. Therefore, an accurate socio-economic impact assessment m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crux of the proposed framework rests in the argument for the integration of the mobile‐sensing and computer vision approaches and use of automation to increase the pace and spatial resolution of stock accounting at a building/component level. The data streams suggested in the figure are, thus, informed by the existing literature on what currently can and ultimately could be extracted from each sensory capture: LiDAR enables accurate measurements of size and geometry of buildings and their facade components (Ackere et al., 2019), visual imaging satisfies minimum requirements to detect and recognize the facade components (Dai et al., 2021), and thermal and hyperspectral imaging enable detection of components’ material composition and wear condition (Ziolkowski et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2020; Cho et al., 2018).…”
Section: Building Stock Characterization: Relevance Challenges and Op...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crux of the proposed framework rests in the argument for the integration of the mobile‐sensing and computer vision approaches and use of automation to increase the pace and spatial resolution of stock accounting at a building/component level. The data streams suggested in the figure are, thus, informed by the existing literature on what currently can and ultimately could be extracted from each sensory capture: LiDAR enables accurate measurements of size and geometry of buildings and their facade components (Ackere et al., 2019), visual imaging satisfies minimum requirements to detect and recognize the facade components (Dai et al., 2021), and thermal and hyperspectral imaging enable detection of components’ material composition and wear condition (Ziolkowski et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2020; Cho et al., 2018).…”
Section: Building Stock Characterization: Relevance Challenges and Op...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of the resulting items was relevant to the topic in question. While there were multiple studies related to detecting and extracting basement information, all employed 3D laser scanning data and/or ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data (e.g., [8][9][10]) which are more expensive and not as widely available as imagery data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR technology has proven its usefulness in multiple fields, such as architecture, heritage and environment, among others (Refs. [6][7][8][9][10]), thanks to its great capacity to acquire massive data with geometric and radiometric information simultaneously. However, this productivity in the acquisition contrasts with the difficulty of its processing, since it requires extensive technical knowledge and a high computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%