2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-006-0051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting content from instructional videos by statistical modelling and classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annotated videos support and drive the students to watch and learn from the videos by an E-Learning archived video. C. Choudary and T. Liu [6], offered a robust technique to appropriately extract the textual content and images from instructional videos. They investigated that the delivery of content material pixels in instructional videos developes a statistical version for classifying the content material pixels.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annotated videos support and drive the students to watch and learn from the videos by an E-Learning archived video. C. Choudary and T. Liu [6], offered a robust technique to appropriately extract the textual content and images from instructional videos. They investigated that the delivery of content material pixels in instructional videos developes a statistical version for classifying the content material pixels.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we are not aiming at exhaustively extracting all blackboard contents to create a lecture "handout" (Choudary and Liu 2007), nor we intend to apply trainedbased handwritten recognition (Plötz et al 2008) but to extract only the most relevant blackboard features that can visually summarize a recorded lecture.…”
Section: Blackboard Edits As Summarization Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we are not aiming at exhaustively extracting all blackboard contents to create a lecture "handout" (Choudary & Liu, 2007;Zhang & He, 2004), nor we intend to apply trained-based handwritten recognition (Plötz, Thurau, & Fink, 2008;Wienecke, Fink, & Sagerer, 2005) but to extract only the most relevant blackboard features that visually summarize a blackboard-based recorded lecture.…”
Section: Blackboard Edits As Summarization Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%