Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Medical Conversations 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.nlpmc-1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Appointment Spans from Medical Conversations

Abstract: Extracting structured information from medical conversations can reduce the documentation burden for doctors and help patients follow through with their care plan. In this paper, we introduce a novel task of extracting appointment spans from medical conversations. We frame this task as a sequence tagging problem and focus on extracting spans for appointment reason and time. However, annotating medical conversations is expensive, time-consuming, and requires considerable domain expertise. Hence, we propose to l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond dictation solutions, there has also been an uptick in adopting manual scribing solutions to reduce the documentation burden so that physicians can focus more on patient care. More recently, there has been a growing interest in leveraging the ASR transcripts and automating parts of the scribing workflows using spoken conversation understanding technologies such as utterance classification [5], information extraction [6,7,8], and conversation summarization [9]. Since speech recognition is upstream of all these dictation and scribing-centered documentation workflows, words mistranscribed by the ASR system [10] can be problematic, leading to users performing time-consuming and laborious corrections [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond dictation solutions, there has also been an uptick in adopting manual scribing solutions to reduce the documentation burden so that physicians can focus more on patient care. More recently, there has been a growing interest in leveraging the ASR transcripts and automating parts of the scribing workflows using spoken conversation understanding technologies such as utterance classification [5], information extraction [6,7,8], and conversation summarization [9]. Since speech recognition is upstream of all these dictation and scribing-centered documentation workflows, words mistranscribed by the ASR system [10] can be problematic, leading to users performing time-consuming and laborious corrections [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%