2015
DOI: 10.1638/2014-0085r1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND ENDOSCOPIC URETERAL STENT PLACEMENT IN AN ASIAN SMALL-CLAWED OTTER (AONYX CINEREA) WITH NEPHROLITHIASIS

Abstract: Urolithiasis is a significant disease concern in Asian small-clawed otters (Aonyx cinerea), with over 60% of captive animals affected. Bilateral ureteral stent placement, using endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) were performed as salvage procedures in a 13-yr-old intact female Asian small-clawed otter following a 7-yr history of nephrolithiasis and progressive renal insufficiency. Following the procedure, radiographs revealed a slight shifting of urolith posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The symptoms of renal osteodystrophy are similar to those of fibrous osteodystrophy, including lameness, loss of teeth, and deformity of the maxilla and mandible [2], none of which were observed in this case. In addition, bone disorders in an Asian small-clawed otter with renal disease have never been reported previously [8,9]. Taken together, our gross data and histological observations do not support signs of renal osteodystrophy in this case.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The symptoms of renal osteodystrophy are similar to those of fibrous osteodystrophy, including lameness, loss of teeth, and deformity of the maxilla and mandible [2], none of which were observed in this case. In addition, bone disorders in an Asian small-clawed otter with renal disease have never been reported previously [8,9]. Taken together, our gross data and histological observations do not support signs of renal osteodystrophy in this case.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%