2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-05926-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a retrospective multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
8
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
87
8
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many tertiary centres have started to use eCPR with intention to rescue OHCA patients without ROSC, whose outcome would otherwise have been fatal. Indeed, initial reports of single cases and small series suggested that eCPR may be able to rescue a substantial proportion of patients [16,17]. However, eCPR is obviously a very resource-intensive strategy and cannot be applied to all OHCA patients, at least not with current devices and in current settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many tertiary centres have started to use eCPR with intention to rescue OHCA patients without ROSC, whose outcome would otherwise have been fatal. Indeed, initial reports of single cases and small series suggested that eCPR may be able to rescue a substantial proportion of patients [16,17]. However, eCPR is obviously a very resource-intensive strategy and cannot be applied to all OHCA patients, at least not with current devices and in current settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 In 423 patients receiving E-CPR, favorable neurologic outcome rate was significantly higher in the IHCA group (34%) compared to the OHCA group (9%), although the latter had a significantly longer time from collapse to E-CPR. 33 Survival differences were even more dramatic between IHCA (42%) and OHCA (15%) groups among 85 non-postcardiotomy patients; however, the finding is complicated by a significantly shorter C-CPR duration in the IHCA group. 34 A systematic review of refractory OHCA found a survival rate of 22%, and 13% had satisfactory neurologic recovery, 35 which is comparable to the 12% favorable neurologic rate in 260 E-CPR OHCAs.…”
Section: E-cpr For Ohca Versus Ihcamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…25 A retrospective multi-center study involving 258 E-CPR OHCAs found that intensive care unit (ICU) survival was 24%, and 19% had favorable neurologic outcomes. 33 Further, a retrospective chart review involving 20 E-CPR OHCAs due to ventricular fibrillation revealed a 95% sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 50% survival at discharge, 50% survival 1 year after discharge, and 40% adequate neurologic function at discharge. 36 A cohort study featuring 1,796 E-CPR OHCA patients reported 29% survival to discharge, and survival did not significantly change across cohorts 37 ; this is similar to the rate described in a propensity-matched study of 24 E-CPR OHCA patients.…”
Section: E-cpr For Ohca Versus Ihcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have examined which ECPR factors are related to the patient's outcome [5][6][7][8][9][10]. In particular, age, witnessed cardiac arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and initial shockable rhythm (ventricular fibrillation [VF] or ventricular tachycardia [VT]) were strongly associated with improvements in mortality and neurological outcomes, and are therefore included in the indications for ECPR in most departments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, age, witnessed cardiac arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and initial shockable rhythm (ventricular fibrillation [VF] or ventricular tachycardia [VT]) were strongly associated with improvements in mortality and neurological outcomes, and are therefore included in the indications for ECPR in most departments. Currently, ECPR should be initiated < 60 min after the patient collapses [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%