1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(90)90216-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Should any infant be excluded?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, marked variations in practice patterns across pediatric referral centers have made the use of these predictors difficult to interpret and none of these criteria has been appropriately validated in large controlled trials. Furthermore, ECMO survivors who would have been excluded by these criteria have been reported on [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unfortunately, marked variations in practice patterns across pediatric referral centers have made the use of these predictors difficult to interpret and none of these criteria has been appropriately validated in large controlled trials. Furthermore, ECMO survivors who would have been excluded by these criteria have been reported on [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A total of 39 patients were placed on venoarterial ECMO by inserting a venous drainage cannula in the right atrium through the right internal jugular vein and an arterial perfusion cannula into the arch of the aorta through the right common carotid artery as reported previously. 5,6 A total of 12 infants were placed on venovenous ECMO by placing a double lumen, single cannula through the internal jugular vein into the right atrium. This double lumen cannula allows for simultaneous venous drainage from the right atrium and arterial reinfusion toward the tricuspid valve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Neurodevelopmental outcome in general in ECMO survivors has been encouraging. 7,8 However, infants with CDH represent a small proportion of the total ECMO population, and no detailed information is available about the quality of survival, intracranial lesions, and neurodevelopmental outcome in a large population of CDH infants treated with ECMO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,27,28 We previously described an initial review of 25 CDH patients who required ECMO and did not find a parameter that predicted mortality with enough certainty to exclude patients from treatment with ECMO. 27 This study represents 15 years of experience and the additional data have allowed for further analysis into the predictive values of various parameters of interest. Minimum pre-ECMO PaCO 2 >70 mm Hg was identified by the ROC curve as a cutoff value with a false-positive rate of zero for predicting mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%