2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracellular matrix molecules exhibit unique expression pattern in the climbing fiber-generating precerebellar nucleus, the inferior olive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While WFA intensity is important for formulating experiments and interpreting the findings, the method by which WFA intensity is measured and analyzed has been inconsistent across studies. Some studies have used semi-quantitative methods to examine relative intensity changes, but these studies lack measures of individual PNNs (Wang et al, 2011, Deak et al, 2012, Yamada and Jinno, 2013, Racz et al, 2014, Kecskes et al, 2015). Other studies examine changes in individual PNNs by averaging the intensity of 15 pixels within a given PNN around the soma (Foscarin et al, 2011, Carulli et al, 2013, Vazquez-Sanroman et al, 2015a), and others have not included details in the methodology (Chen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While WFA intensity is important for formulating experiments and interpreting the findings, the method by which WFA intensity is measured and analyzed has been inconsistent across studies. Some studies have used semi-quantitative methods to examine relative intensity changes, but these studies lack measures of individual PNNs (Wang et al, 2011, Deak et al, 2012, Yamada and Jinno, 2013, Racz et al, 2014, Kecskes et al, 2015). Other studies examine changes in individual PNNs by averaging the intensity of 15 pixels within a given PNN around the soma (Foscarin et al, 2011, Carulli et al, 2013, Vazquez-Sanroman et al, 2015a), and others have not included details in the methodology (Chen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing histological quantifications of the normal neural ECM are commonly semi-quantitative in that they assign grades to qualitative judgments (e.g., rating how intense staining appears) or in that they introduce manual error checks (where users flip through processed images and manually add/delete cells from identified populations). 8,11,19,22,23,32 Although the manual error checks in some semiautomated analyses minimize error to nearly 0% (if error is being measured relative to manual counts), this loss in time efficiency is not always desirable. For the analysis of percentages, such as that presented here, while accuracy is still important, consistency is equally important and minor errors will not be detrimental.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 The ECM plays an integral role in cellular events and signaling, yet a comprehensive quantification of the spatial and regional distribution of the ECM in the brain has not yet been done, although some characterizations have been reported. 713 These analyses, however, are often restricted to a small area of interest or are semi-quantitative. A thorough characterization of the ECM will define both its regional and cellular distribution, including the area covered by these molecules and the percentage of major neural phenotypes that associate with these molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunogen is against the mouse myeloma cell line NS0‐derived recombinant human tenascin‐R isoform 1 (Glu34–Phe1358). This antibody has been tested and referenced in several publications (Xiao et al, ; Weber et al, ; Kecskes et al, ). Tenascin‐R was detected in immersion‐fixed paraffin‐embedded sections of human brainstem (https://www.rndsystems.com/products/human-tenascin-r-antibody_af3865).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%