Translating Regenerative Medicine to the Clinic 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800548-4.00002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracellular Matrix as an Inductive Scaffold for Functional Tissue Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
(220 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) demonstrated that an intact basement membrane complex was preserved on serous side. Basement membrane is a critical component of the ECM that supports and facilitates the growth of cells1248. Its distinct surface chemistry may modulate focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding, and different adhesive interactions activate various intracellular signaling pathways that direct cell cytokines release49.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) demonstrated that an intact basement membrane complex was preserved on serous side. Basement membrane is a critical component of the ECM that supports and facilitates the growth of cells1248. Its distinct surface chemistry may modulate focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding, and different adhesive interactions activate various intracellular signaling pathways that direct cell cytokines release49.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potentially ideal BP ECM scaffold should exhibit reduced antigenicity, while maintaining structure-function properties and recellularization potential111213. A range of approaches have been explored for reducing antigenicity of BP including decellularization (e.g., SDS, Triton X-100, trypsin)1415, enzymatic removal of α-Gal (i.e., α-galactosidase)16, and stepwise, solubilization-based antigen removal1718.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in applications where a scaffold or cellular construct provides mechanical support, early degradation may reduce the integrity of the host tissue or organ, potentially leading to further host injury. Scaffolds or constructs that persist for too long in the host may inhibit cellular remodeling, which can prevent integration and angiogenesis, and instead lead to encapsulation and scar formation [39]. Attempting to tune the in vivo degradation characteristics of natural materials through chemical methods (such as cross-linking) should be done with caution, as such chemically modified materials have been shown to produce undesirable host responses [12].…”
Section: Scaffold-host Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracellular matrix (ECM) that remains after lung decellularization is not an inert material, but rather a complex milieu of physical signals that encodes a ‘biochemical and mechanical language’ for resident cells. ECM-cell interactions govern cell viability, signaling pathways, proliferation, and differentiation [1820]. Therefore, even seemingly minute changes in these matrix cues may induce positive outcomes such as cell engraftment and directed cell differentiation, or negative outcomes such as reduced cell attachment, cell death, inflammation, and cell-driven fibrotic matrix remodeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%