2019
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracellular Electron Uptake by Two Methanosarcina Species

Abstract: GAC or electrodes). A comparison of functional gene categories between the two Methanosarcina showed differences regarding energy metabolism, which could explain dissimilarities concerning electromethanogenesis at fixed potentials. We suggest that these dissimilarities are minimized in the presence of an electrogenic DIET partner (e.g., Geobacter), which can modulate its surface redox potentials by adjusting the expression of electroactive surface proteins.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, Methanosarcina- species dominate on corroded Fe 0 -structures [710]. Therefore, we propose that Methanosarcina retrieves electrons directly from Fe 0 , extrapolating from recent findings that Methanosarcina can retrieve extracellular electrons directly from poised electrodes [29, 30], electrogenic syntrophic partners [31, 32], or electrically conductive particles [3134]. Plausible scenarios for direct electron uptake in Methanosarcina have only recently been substantiated, using comparative transcriptomics [35].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, Methanosarcina- species dominate on corroded Fe 0 -structures [710]. Therefore, we propose that Methanosarcina retrieves electrons directly from Fe 0 , extrapolating from recent findings that Methanosarcina can retrieve extracellular electrons directly from poised electrodes [29, 30], electrogenic syntrophic partners [31, 32], or electrically conductive particles [3134]. Plausible scenarios for direct electron uptake in Methanosarcina have only recently been substantiated, using comparative transcriptomics [35].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Methanosarcina is the only known genus that includes species incapable of methanogenesis from H 2 [22, 25, 26], acetate [71], or both [23, 24]. Additionally, Methanosarcina includes species capable of direct electron uptake from electrodes [29, 30] and other cells either directly [29, 31, 32], or via conductive minerals [29, 3134, 72]. The closest relative of Baltic- Methanosarcina was the non-acetoclastic and non-hydrogenotrophic M. subterranea (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methanogens differ in their H 2 threshold and H 2 affinity (Thauer et al, 2008) and a correlation between their H 2 threshold and Fe(0) corrosion rate was already suggested (Palacios Jaramillo, 2019). In addition, some methanogens were found to excrete hydrogenase enzymes to catalyze the H 2 evolution reaction (Deutzmann et al, 2015;Tsurumaru et al, 2018), while evidence exist that some methanogenic strains have a direct EET mechanism (Beese-Vasbender et al, 2015a;Rowe et al, 2019;Yee et al, 2019). Also the sulfate reducing IS4 strain likely has a direct EET mechanism (Beese-Vasbender et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Regarding Methanosarcinales, their role in Fe 0 corrosion could be simply that of commensals feeding on the acetate generated by acetogens, or they could be involved in direct electron uptake from extracellular electron donors (Rotaru et al, 2014b, 2014a; Yee et al, 2019; Yee and Rotaru, 2020) including Fe 0 (Palacios et al, 2019a). However, direct electron uptake in Methanosarcinales is poorly understood and remains to be further investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%