2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two studies which showed no significant differences in complications between exteriorization and intraperitoneal repair of uterine incision at caesarean delivery [11,12]. In this study we noted that there was no endometritis in the group where no uterine mopping was done and in 65 cases uterus was mopped and 4 cases from this group had signs of endometritis but the p value was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…There are two studies which showed no significant differences in complications between exteriorization and intraperitoneal repair of uterine incision at caesarean delivery [11,12]. In this study we noted that there was no endometritis in the group where no uterine mopping was done and in 65 cases uterus was mopped and 4 cases from this group had signs of endometritis but the p value was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%