2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extra Tree forests for sub-acute ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in MR sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While an increasing number of automatic solutions are presented, there are also a number of semi-automatic methods indicating the difficulty of the task. Among the automatic algorithms, only a few employ pattern classification techniques to learn a segmentation function (Prakash et al, 2006; Maier et al, 2014, 2015c) or design probabilistic generative models of the lesion formation (Derntl et al, 2015; Menze et al, 2015; Forbes et al, 2010; Kabir et al, 2007; Martel et al, 1999). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While an increasing number of automatic solutions are presented, there are also a number of semi-automatic methods indicating the difficulty of the task. Among the automatic algorithms, only a few employ pattern classification techniques to learn a segmentation function (Prakash et al, 2006; Maier et al, 2014, 2015c) or design probabilistic generative models of the lesion formation (Derntl et al, 2015; Menze et al, 2015; Forbes et al, 2010; Kabir et al, 2007; Martel et al, 1999). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where provided, the definition of acute stroke often mixes with the sub-acute phase (Ghosh et al, 2014; Mah et al, 2014; Tsai et al, 2014). Only a few studies give details on pathological inclusion and exclusion criteria of the data (James et al, 2006; Maier et al, 2015c), although these are important characteristics: Results obtained on right-hemispheric stroke only (Dastidar et al, 2000) are not comparable to ones omitting small lesions (Mah et al, 2014) nor to those obtained from two central axial slices of each volume (Li et al, 2004). Comparability is further impeded by a wide range of dataset sizes ( N ∈ [2, 57]), employed MRI sequences and quantitative evaluation measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate our method we used the SISS brain multimodal MR dataset from the ISLES 2015 workshop [17] and we compared with a classical patch-based approach [29]. Overall, our findings show that the proposed method is capable of preserving anatomical details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We used the SISS dataset from the ISLES 2015 workshop [17]. Specifically, we used the training dataset, which includes 28 subjects.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ischemic brain stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability in major industrialized countries [5]. To detect the Ischemic brain cells, the computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) is the two important screening tests [6,7]. The existing methods used the conventional threshold techniques, but this method only has the limited accuracy and repeatability [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%