Abstract:BackgroundPostcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) refractory to inotropic support and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) occurs rarely but is almost universally fatal without mechanical circulatory support. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we looked at the evidence behind the use of veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) in refractory PCCS from a patient survival rate and determinants of outcome viewpoint.MethodsA systematic review was performed in January 2017 using PubMed (with… Show more
“…Factors requiring ECMO support after open or endovascular repair for type A dissection include biventricular dysfunction from a persistent flap or tear in the main coronary arteries, propagation of the tear or dissection into the coronary arteries, or inadequate myocardial protection during open surgical repair. One group reported a high utilization of ECMO post‐TAAD repair of nearly 12% . This was a single institution series where ECMO utilization was associated with an in hospital mortality rate of 65%.…”
Requirement for ECMO support in acute aortic dissection is associated with extremely high mortality irrespective of when the intervention is performed.
“…Factors requiring ECMO support after open or endovascular repair for type A dissection include biventricular dysfunction from a persistent flap or tear in the main coronary arteries, propagation of the tear or dissection into the coronary arteries, or inadequate myocardial protection during open surgical repair. One group reported a high utilization of ECMO post‐TAAD repair of nearly 12% . This was a single institution series where ECMO utilization was associated with an in hospital mortality rate of 65%.…”
Requirement for ECMO support in acute aortic dissection is associated with extremely high mortality irrespective of when the intervention is performed.
“…Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a promising, yet a highly invasive therapeutic option in cardiovascular intensive care medicine . It is associated with a high incidence of complications and recently attention has been directed to the emergence of microbubbles (MB) within the circulatory system . MB can lead to neurological morbidity or mortality due to a cascade of pathophysiological reactions, including diffuse cerebral microischemia as well as inflammatory reactions and activation of the complement system .…”
Occurrence of microbubbles (MB) is a major problem during venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) with partially severe clinical complications. The aim of this study was to establish an in vitro ECLS setup for the generation and detection of MB. Furthermore, we assessed different MB elimination strategies. Patient and ECLS circuit were simulated using reservoirs, a centrifugal pump, a membrane oxygenator, and an occluder (modified roller pump). The system was primed with a glycerin solution of 44%. Three different revolution speeds (2500, 3000, and 3400 rpm) were applied. For MB generation, the inflow line of the pump was either statically or dynamically (15 rpm) occluded. A bubble counter was used for MB detection. The effectiveness of the oxygenator and dynamic bubble traps (DBTs) was evaluated in regard to MB elimination capacities. MB generation was highly dependent on negative pressure at the inflow line. Increasing revolution speeds and restriction of the inflow led to increased MB activity. The significant difference between inflow and outflow MB volume identified the centrifugal pump as a main source. We could show that the oxygenator’s ability to withhold larger MB is limited. The application of one or multiple DBTs leads to a significant reduction in MB count and overall gas volume. The application of DBT can significantly reduce the overall gas volume, especially at high flow rates. Moreover, large MB can effectively be broken down for faster absorption. In general, the incidence of MBs is significantly dependent on pump speed and restriction of the inflow. The centrifugal pump was identified as a major source of MB generation.
“…In their systematic review and meta-analysis of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS), Khorsandi and colleagues report a pooled survival to hospital discharge of 30.8% and suggest a number of adverse prognostic indicators [1]. Whilst we agree that postcardiotomy VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock does indeed provide a significant survival benefit, we wish to highlight several limitations so as to aid interpretation of this study and inform future analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reason why we did not separate the postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patient into transplant and non-transplant cohorts was the limited number of studies and the limited number of subjects within each study (table 1) [ 7]. We felt that in order for a meta-analysis to have the best chance at yielding any statistical significance these cohorts should be combined, albeit at the expense of greater heterogeneity.…”
Section: Competing Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their systematic review and meta-analysis, Khorsandi and colleagues report a synthesis of case-series pertinent to the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for PCCS. Whilst we acknowledge the potential survival benefit for carefully selected patients for what is ordinarily a condition with high mortality, we wish to comment on several aspects of the study in the context of its application to clinical practice.Keywords: Postcardiotomy, VA-EMO, Systematic review, Cardiogenic shockIn their systematic review and meta-analysis of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS), Khorsandi and colleagues report a pooled survival to hospital discharge of 30.8% and suggest a number of adverse prognostic indicators [1]. Whilst we agree that postcardiotomy VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock does indeed provide a significant survival benefit, we wish to highlight several limitations so as to aid interpretation of this study and inform future analyses.…”
Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is a rare but catastrophic syndrome that can occur following separation from cardiopulmonary bypass or at any time during the immediate postoperative course. The management of PCCS varies between clinicians, institutions and countries. The available evidence to guide this practice is limited. In their systematic review and meta-analysis, Khorsandi and colleagues report a synthesis of case-series pertinent to the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for PCCS. Whilst we acknowledge the potential survival benefit for carefully selected patients for what is ordinarily a condition with high mortality, we wish to comment on several aspects of the study in the context of its application to clinical practice.Keywords: Postcardiotomy, VA-EMO, Systematic review, Cardiogenic shockIn their systematic review and meta-analysis of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS), Khorsandi and colleagues report a pooled survival to hospital discharge of 30.8% and suggest a number of adverse prognostic indicators [1]. Whilst we agree that postcardiotomy VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock does indeed provide a significant survival benefit, we wish to highlight several limitations so as to aid interpretation of this study and inform future analyses.With regards the search strategy, it was unclear from which database(s) (Medline and/or PubMed) articles were retrieved and from when the search extends. A recent Cochrane review advised against the pooling of studies from prior to 2000 due to significant advances in technology, yet three of the included studies are from the 1990s [2]. The use of other databases, a Google™ search and searching the bibliography of included manuscripts could have ensured a more comprehensive strategy. With regards inclusion and exclusion criteria, all transplant and non-transplant patients receiving VA-ECMO for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock were included. At our institution, it is generally more common for VA-ECMO to be employed following heart transplantation than it is following non-transplant cardiac surgery. Anecdotally, we also find that outcomes following planned VA-ECMO use following heart transplantation are better as compared to unplanned non-transplant postcardiotomy VA-ECMO. Given that transplant and non-transplant patients have very different baseline characteristics together with different pre, intra and postoperative courses, it may have been advisable to statistically treat transplant and non-transplant groups separately to further reduce data heterogeneity. The finding that all studies were observational in design and with many employing retrospective data collection, is shared by our systematic review of extracorporeal life support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock [3]. We also found considerable difficulty in retrieving all relevant articles due to variable definitions of PCCS and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in the literature.With regards ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.