1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01039191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinguishing Class A fires with multipurpose chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the other gaseous components of the filtered SPGG 1 effluent, namely CO 2 and N 2 , have been measured [6]. The concentration requirements for K 2 CO 3 (s), which has unknown suppression effectiveness, was estimated using the ratio of Ewing's [4] results for peak effectiveness of K 2 CO 3 (s) and NaHCO 3 (s), in conjunction with cup burner results for NaHCO 3 (s) [6]. This calculation yields a mass fraction of 0.042, denoted in Table 2 as "K 2 CO 3 (s)active".…”
Section: Comparison Of Agent Effectiveness: Suppression Of Non-premix...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results for the other gaseous components of the filtered SPGG 1 effluent, namely CO 2 and N 2 , have been measured [6]. The concentration requirements for K 2 CO 3 (s), which has unknown suppression effectiveness, was estimated using the ratio of Ewing's [4] results for peak effectiveness of K 2 CO 3 (s) and NaHCO 3 (s), in conjunction with cup burner results for NaHCO 3 (s) [6]. This calculation yields a mass fraction of 0.042, denoted in Table 2 as "K 2 CO 3 (s)active".…”
Section: Comparison Of Agent Effectiveness: Suppression Of Non-premix...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle size can influence suppression effectiveness [4]. The majority of the SPGG particulate is very small and it is assumed that the particulate is smaller than the critical diameter [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the conclusions of experiments, the size of powder particles was set to 0.1 mm [1][2][3]6]. But Ewening et al [9] showed that the overall effectiveness of each dry chemical depends on its particle size, the degree of its decomposition and/ or vaporization. All tested particles of chemical below a unique limiting size completely decompose and/or vaporize in the tested fire and have the same extinguishing effectiveness [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But Ewening et al [9] showed that the overall effectiveness of each dry chemical depends on its particle size, the degree of its decomposition and/ or vaporization. All tested particles of chemical below a unique limiting size completely decompose and/or vaporize in the tested fire and have the same extinguishing effectiveness [9,10]. All powder fire extinguishing devices operate on the same principle: the powder is extruded from a vessel by the pressure of the carrier (extrusion) gas, such as argon, carbon dioxide, helium and nitrogen [1,3,4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the conclusions of experiments, the size of powder particles was set to 0.1 mm [1][2][3]6]. But Ewening et al [9] showed that the overall effectiveness of each dry chemical depends on its particle size, the degree of its decomposition and/or vaporization. All tested particles of chemical below a unique limiting size completely decompose and/or vaporize in the tested fire and have the same extinguishing effectiveness [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%