1987
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90167-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinction spectroscopy: A novel laser spectroscopic technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this state, there is a large difference between the theoretical predictions and the measurement of Mannervik (1982, 1985), who reported a very small experimental error (0.1 meV). The observation of Cederquist and Mannervik (2.6 ± 0.1 meV) is in agreement with the value of 3.2 ± 0.6 meV measured by Pedrotti (1987) but the large error on the latter value does not bring us any further. The present result, 3.78 meV, is in good agreement with the value reported by Davis and Chung, 3.71 meV, but is still 1.2 meV larger than the value observed by Cederquist and Mannervik and 0.5 meV larger than most other calculations.…”
Section: Autoionization Widthssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this state, there is a large difference between the theoretical predictions and the measurement of Mannervik (1982, 1985), who reported a very small experimental error (0.1 meV). The observation of Cederquist and Mannervik (2.6 ± 0.1 meV) is in agreement with the value of 3.2 ± 0.6 meV measured by Pedrotti (1987) but the large error on the latter value does not bring us any further. The present result, 3.78 meV, is in good agreement with the value reported by Davis and Chung, 3.71 meV, but is still 1.2 meV larger than the value observed by Cederquist and Mannervik and 0.5 meV larger than most other calculations.…”
Section: Autoionization Widthssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…oNicolaides and Aspromallis (1983), MCHF + correlation approach. pPedrotti (1987), extinction spectroscopy. qWu and Xi (1991), SP method combined with R-matrix r Ziem et al (1975),.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAP method was used to calculate the two lowest 2 P 0 [1s(2s2p) 3 P] and 2 P 0 [1s(2s2p) 1 P] resonances of the lithium atom and 1 S resonance of H − . For the lowest 2 P 0 [1s(2s2p) 3 P] resonance, there are experimental estimates of energy and width [51][52][53]76], for the next 2 P 0 [1s(2s2p) 1 P] resonance where only the energy is known [77,78]. The experimental results are in satisfactory agreement with the theoretical ones [54,[79][80][81][82].…”
Section: Calculation Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%