2006
DOI: 10.1126/science.313.5786.441a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conservation prioritization must consider important socioeconomical factors in addition to observed or predicted extinction risk (Possingham et al 2002;Miller et al 2006), the latter is a key input variable for priority setting. Therefore, identifying species of conservation concern among data deficient groupers is considered high priority research for their management (Sadovy de Mitcheson et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conservation prioritization must consider important socioeconomical factors in addition to observed or predicted extinction risk (Possingham et al 2002;Miller et al 2006), the latter is a key input variable for priority setting. Therefore, identifying species of conservation concern among data deficient groupers is considered high priority research for their management (Sadovy de Mitcheson et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species lists (Wachlevski and Rocha 2010;Telles et al 2012;Affonso et al 2014;AlmeidaGomes et al 2014;Crivellari et al 2014) typically constitute an essential first step for the monitoring of the fauna of specific habitats and the assessment of the status of species and their populations, which can be used to guide conservation decision-making (Pimenta et al 2005), especially considering that most strategies are based on local species richness (Rocha et al 2003) and on the extinction risk of different species (Miller et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the regional lists are not updated regularly, they tend to provide outdated assessments of conservation status. This situation may reduce the effectiveness of these lists as guidelines for conservation practices, given that most measures are currently based on the evaluation of the extinction risk of the species (Miller et al 2006). It is important to note that the regional lists are important conservation tools, given that most measures are implemented on a local scale (Possingham et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%