2020
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinction debt in local habitats: quantifying the roles of random drift, immigration and emigration

Abstract: We developed a time-dependent stochastic neutral model for predicting diverse temporal trajectories of biodiversity change in response to ecological disturbance (i.e. habitat destruction) and dispersal dynamic (i.e. emigration and immigration). The model is general and predicts how transition behaviours of extinction may accumulate according to a different combination of random drift, immigration rate, emigration rate and the degree of habitat destruction. We show that immigration, emigration, the areal size o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, large initial habitat losses may produce fewer than expected extinctions and so fewer than predicted orphaned species, at least in the short term. Areas subjected to habitat loss accumulate extinction debt (Tilman et al, 1994) because extinctions take generations to be realized (Wearn et al, 2012), and can be mitigated by immigration or recolonization from nearby habitat patches (Hanski & Ovaskainen, 2002; Wu et al, 2020). We assumed that primary extinctions and orphaned species occurred at each area loss step with habitat destruction, but in real situations, extinctions, and associated orphaned species, could take decades to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, large initial habitat losses may produce fewer than expected extinctions and so fewer than predicted orphaned species, at least in the short term. Areas subjected to habitat loss accumulate extinction debt (Tilman et al, 1994) because extinctions take generations to be realized (Wearn et al, 2012), and can be mitigated by immigration or recolonization from nearby habitat patches (Hanski & Ovaskainen, 2002; Wu et al, 2020). We assumed that primary extinctions and orphaned species occurred at each area loss step with habitat destruction, but in real situations, extinctions, and associated orphaned species, could take decades to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erosion of genetic diversity at detectable levels has a long time lag that is influenced by the effective population size, the number of generations and the degree of habitat loss and fragmentation (e.g. Tilman et al, 1994; Krauss et al, 2010; Hoban et al, 2014; Wu et al, 2020). Conversely, genetic structure responds more rapidly to habitat fragmentation (Keyghobadi et al, 2005; Pflüger et al, 2019) because gene flow is impeded by isolation of local patches (Balkenhol et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat fragmentation produces landscapes characterized by spatially isolated remnants, many of which lose species through time (Dirzo & Raven, 2003). An important explanation for such species loss is disruption of dispersal between patches, distorting immigration–emigration dynamics, even among vagile species like birds (Wu et al, 2020). Some tropical forest bird species, in particular those of the forest understory, appear to be reluctant or unable to fly across habitat discontinuities, leading to inevitable species loss in fragments as recolonization is reduced or eliminated (Gillies et al, 2011; Laurance & Gomez, 2005; Robinson & Sherry, 2012; Van Houtan et al, 2007; Willis, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%