2023
DOI: 10.1126/science.add2889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinct in the wild: The precarious state of Earth’s most threatened group of species

Abstract: Extinct in the Wild (EW) species are placed at the highest risk of extinction under the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, but the extent and variation in this risk have never been evaluated. Harnessing global databases of ex situ animal and plant holdings, we report on the perilous state of EW species. Most EW animal species—already compromised by their small number of founders—are maintained at population sizes far below the thresholds necessary to ensure demographic security. Most EW p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such validation tests should also employ hindcasting to assess model predictions about species that went extinct, such as the passenger pigeon (Murray et al 2017 ), mammoth (Díez-del-Molino et al 2023 ), and woolly rhinoceros (Lord et al 2020 ). In addition, there are dozens of species classified as extinct in the wild that possess viable captive populations (Smith et al 2023 ), and these can provide important test data to validate AI model predictions. Conversely, there are hundreds of mammals and birds that have been downlisted in the Red List, some of which represent conservation success stories of species that recovered.…”
Section: Training and Testing The Ai Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such validation tests should also employ hindcasting to assess model predictions about species that went extinct, such as the passenger pigeon (Murray et al 2017 ), mammoth (Díez-del-Molino et al 2023 ), and woolly rhinoceros (Lord et al 2020 ). In addition, there are dozens of species classified as extinct in the wild that possess viable captive populations (Smith et al 2023 ), and these can provide important test data to validate AI model predictions. Conversely, there are hundreds of mammals and birds that have been downlisted in the Red List, some of which represent conservation success stories of species that recovered.…”
Section: Training and Testing The Ai Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relentless intensification of human activities has fundamentally altered the distribution of wildlife globally (Gaynor et al., 2018 ). Human activities drive habitat reduction and fragmentation, and even cause species extinction in extreme cases (Ceballos et al., 2015 ; Cooke et al., 2023 ; Smith et al., 2023 ). Therefore, investing in biological conservation is essential to maintain and enhance habitat suitability and connectivity for wildlife.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%