2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Externalizing behavior trajectories: The role of parenting, sibling relationships and child personality

Abstract: a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oBased on longitudinal multilevel modeling and using a multi-informant strategy, this study examines trajectories of externalizing problem behavior (EPB) in childhood as predicted by parental behavior (absolute level of parenting [ALP] and parental differential treatment [PDT]), parental self-efficacy (PSE), child personality and sibling relationships. Besides main effects, several interactions were tested. The effects of changes in parenting on changes in EPB were also exa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(109 reference statements)
7
42
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While the current study did not differentiate between parental and maternal parenting styles, many studies have emphasized the importance of examining each parent's styles separately to capture their independent effects on children's outcomes (Aldhafri, 2011;Aldhafri, 2014;Chao, 1994;Meunier et al, 2011). This research shows that maternal styles might be effective in promoting specific children's outcomes within specific life conditions, while paternal styles might not have the same degree of influence or the same pattern of connections.…”
Section: Review Of European Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While the current study did not differentiate between parental and maternal parenting styles, many studies have emphasized the importance of examining each parent's styles separately to capture their independent effects on children's outcomes (Aldhafri, 2011;Aldhafri, 2014;Chao, 1994;Meunier et al, 2011). This research shows that maternal styles might be effective in promoting specific children's outcomes within specific life conditions, while paternal styles might not have the same degree of influence or the same pattern of connections.…”
Section: Review Of European Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Future research may examine the connections between teaching styles and students' outcomes while considering possible meditational factors, particularly students' personal attributes that were found to interact with environmental variables in affecting students' outcomes (Hannum & Dvorak, 2004;Meunier et al, 2011;Smith & College, 2007). Other related factors that may influence students' outcomes (including their motivation) include cultural values, peer pressure, and parental involvement (e.g., Lee, Daniels, & Kissinger, 2006;Smith & College, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results lead to some important considerations for clinical purposes as well as giving empirical support to existing parenting programs. Because relations were well established between parenting and children's EB (e.g., Meunier et al, 2011), the impact of EB on the development of the disorganization Q-score has highlighted the importance of childrearing behavior that can be improved by parenting programs. Such programs promote parental development through the implementation of positive support, rules, autonomy demands and monitoring techniques, and a decrease in inconsistent parenting, harsh punishment, ignoring and material rewarding techniques (e.g., Juffer, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van Ijzendoorn, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderately significant correlations (n = 49) were observed between the two assessments, ranging from .51 (rewarding, pb .01) to .84 (discipline, pb .01). As in Meunier et al (2011), in order to limit the number of predictors in the models, a support-to-negative-control ratio was calculated by dividing the support score by the negative control score. A score of 1 thus indicated equal amounts of support and negative control, whereas a score less than 1 indicated more negative control than support, and a score greater than 1 indicated more support than control.…”
Section: Measures Of Time-varying Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%